These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

288 related items for PubMed ID: 32267624

  • 1. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial).
    van IJsselmuiden MN, van Oudheusden A, Veen J, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder CM, Housmans S, van Kuijk S, Deprest J, Bongers MY, van Eijndhoven H.
    BJOG; 2020 Sep; 127(10):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 32267624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HW.
    BMJ; 2015 Jul 23; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol).
    van IJsselmuiden MN, Coolen AL, Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Bongers M, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder CM, Deprest J, van Eijndhoven HW.
    BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep 17; 14():112. PubMed ID: 25231240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF.
    BMJ; 2019 Sep 10; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ, Kreuwel IA, Dijkstra JR, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HW.
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb 10; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Izett-Kay ML, Rahmanou P, Cartwright RJ, Price N, Jackson SR.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul 10; 33(7):1957-1965. PubMed ID: 34424347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
    Geoffrion R, Larouche M.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr 10; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Manchester Procedure vs Sacrospinous Hysteropexy for Treatment of Uterine Descent: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Enklaar RA, Schulten SFM, van Eijndhoven HWF, Weemhoff M, van Leijsen SAL, van der Weide MC, van Bavel J, Verkleij-Hagoort AC, Adang EMM, Kluivers KB, SAM Study Group.
    JAMA; 2023 Aug 15; 330(7):626-635. PubMed ID: 37581670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Schulten SF, Detollenaere RJ, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, Van Eijndhoven HW.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug 15; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Richter HE, Sridhar A, Nager CW, Komesu YM, Harvie HS, Zyczynski HM, Rardin C, Visco A, Mazloomdoost D, Thomas S, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan 15; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
    Schulten SFM, Enklaar RA, Kluivers KB, van Leijsen SAL, Jansen-van der Weide MC, Adang EMM, van Bavel J, van Dongen H, Gerritse MBE, van Gestel I, Malmberg GGA, Mouw RJC, van Rumpt-van de Geest DA, Spaans WA, van der Steen A, Stekelenburg J, Tiersma ESM, Verkleij-Hagoort AC, Vollebregt A, Wingen CBM, Weemhoff M, van Eijndhoven HWF.
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr 02; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
    Gutman RE, Rardin CR, Sokol ER, Matthews C, Park AJ, Iglesia CB, Geoffrion R, Sokol AI, Karram M, Cundiff GW, Blomquist JL, Barber MD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan 02; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Efficacy and pregnancy outcomes of laparoscopic single sheet mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Pandeva I, Mistry M, Fayyad A.
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Mar 02; 36(3):787-793. PubMed ID: 27224927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing uterine preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh versus laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse.
    Doğan O, Yassa M, Eren E, Birol İlter P, Tuğ N.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Jun 02; 297():120-125. PubMed ID: 38608354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ mobility after treatment for uterine descent: differences between surgical procedures.
    van IJsselmuiden MN, Lecomte-Grosbras P, Witz JF, Brieu M, Cosson M, van Eijndhoven HWF.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct 02; 31(10):2119-2127. PubMed ID: 32277268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Recurrent surgery in uterine prolapse: A nationwide register study.
    Brunes M, Johannesson U, Drca A, Bergman I, Söderberg M, Warnqvist A, Ek M.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 May 02; 101(5):532-541. PubMed ID: 35257371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.