These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

247 related items for PubMed ID: 32284188

  • 1. Marginal adaptation of zirconia complete-coverage fixed dental restorations made from digital scans or conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tabesh M, Nejatidanesh F, Savabi G, Davoudi A, Savabi O, Mirmohammadi H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):603-610. PubMed ID: 32284188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow.
    Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Sep; 17(7):1759-64. PubMed ID: 23086333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
    Arezoobakhsh A, Shayegh SS, Jamali Ghomi A, Hakimaneh SMR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30982618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of an indirect impression scanning system and two direct intraoral scanning systems in vivo.
    Bosniac P, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2421-2427. PubMed ID: 30298453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Marginal fit of zirconia copings fabricated after conventional impression making and digital scanning: An in vitro study.
    Carrilho Baltazar Vaz IM, Pimentel Coelho Lino Carracho JF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):223.e1-223.e6. PubMed ID: 32336539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B, Oh KC, Haam D, Lee JH, Moon HS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
    An S, Kim S, Choi H, Lee JH, Moon HS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R, Figueras-Álvarez O, Cabratosa-Termes J, Oliver-Parra R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: Marginal and internal fit.
    Benic GI, Sailer I, Zeltner M, Gütermann JN, Özcan M, Mühlemann S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):426-431. PubMed ID: 30396708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.