These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

274 related items for PubMed ID: 32379473

  • 1. Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Lu X, Zhang X, Chen H.
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Jun; 112(6):467-473. PubMed ID: 32379473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L, Xu F, Yuan J.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun 28; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M, Majumdar A, Boyapati R, Chung W, Worland T, Terbah R, Wei J, Lontos S, Angus P, Vaughan R.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun 28; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
    Rout G, Sharma S, Gunjan D, Kedia S, Nayak B, Shalimar.
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr 28; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS, Choi J, Shin WC.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul 26; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
    Robertson M, Ng J, Abu Shawish W, Swaine A, Skardoon G, Huynh A, Deshpande S, Low ZY, Sievert W, Angus P.
    Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul 26; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Chang A, Ouejiaraphant C, Akarapatima K, Rattanasupa A, Prachayakul V.
    Clin Endosc; 2021 Mar 26; 54(2):211-221. PubMed ID: 32668528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A, Gharibpoor F, Mahdipour Z, Samadani AA.
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec 01; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, Ngu JH, Schultz M, Abazi R, Zakko L, Thornton S, Wilkinson K, Khor CJ, Murray IA, Laursen SB, International Gastrointestinal Bleeding Consortium.
    BMJ; 2017 Jan 04; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E, Yılmaz S, Doğan NÖ, Pekdemir M.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan 04; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.
    Tantai XX, Liu N, Yang LB, Wei ZC, Xiao CL, Song YH, Wang JH.
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec 07; 25(45):6668-6680. PubMed ID: 31832005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Far from an ideal score.
    Aluizio CLS, Montes CG, Reis GFSR, Nagasako CK.
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021 Dec 07; 76():e2921. PubMed ID: 34190855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
    Budimir I, Gradišer M, Nikolić M, Baršić N, Ljubičić N, Kralj D, Budimir I.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov 07; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study.
    Zhong M, Chen WJ, Lu XY, Qian J, Zhu CQ.
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Dec 07; 17(12):820-828. PubMed ID: 27930875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED.
    Tang Y, Shen J, Zhang F, Zhou X, Tang Z, You T.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan 07; 36(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28673695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.