These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


189 related items for PubMed ID: 32406151

  • 41. The 3D emergence profile on implant-supported restorations: A method for evaluating restorative angles.
    Mancini L, Thoma DS, Marchetti E, Jung RE, Strauss FJ.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1264-1270. PubMed ID: 37317633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. A technique for managing and accurate registration of periimplant soft tissues.
    Ntounis A, Petropoulou A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Oct; 104(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 20875533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Timing implant provisionalization: Decision-making and systematic workflow.
    Esquivel J, Gomez Meda R, Villarroel M.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Jun; 36(6):858-867. PubMed ID: 38284429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. The modification of interim cylinders for the fabrication of cement-retained implant-supported provisional restorations.
    Hirayama H, Kang KH, Oishi Y.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 14564296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Restorative responsibilities for achieving exceptional implant esthetics.
    Babushkin JA.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Jun; 34(6):418-23. PubMed ID: 25162387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Fabricating a provisional restoration for a 2-stage, single-tooth implant with less than optimal angulation.
    Maalhagh-Fard A, Badr S.
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Dec; 10(4):234-6. PubMed ID: 11781972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. A digital technique for fabricating implant-supported interim restorations in the esthetic zone.
    Liu X, Tan Y, Liu J, Tan J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):540-544. PubMed ID: 28709675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Digital transfer of the subgingival contour and emergence profile of the provisional restoration to the final bone-anchored fixed restoration.
    Kurosaki Y, Mino T, Maekawa K, Izumi K, Kuboki T.
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):125-129. PubMed ID: 30455114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. A method for obtaining peri-implant soft-tissue contours by using screw-retained provisional restorations as impression copings: a clinical report.
    Tsai BY.
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Oct; 37(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 20553160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Transferring emergence profile and position of interim restorative implant fixture. A novel digital technique.
    Mesquida J, Firmino D, Matji C, Ginebreda I, Puterman I, Fien MJ, Blasi A, Noharet R, Bauza G.
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2024 May 10; 19(2):140-150. PubMed ID: 38726856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Custom impression coping for an exact registration of the healed tissue in the esthetic implant restoration.
    Hinds KF.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Dec 10; 17(6):584-91. PubMed ID: 9497745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Esthetic evaluation of single implant restorations, adjacent single implant restorations, and implant-supported fixed partial dentures: A 1-year prospective study.
    Boon L, De Mars G, Favril C, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Vandamme K.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Feb 10; 22(1):128-137. PubMed ID: 31912661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Maxillary complete-arch implant-supported restoration: A digital scanning and maxillomandibular relationship workflow.
    Ahmed WM, Verhaeghe TV, McCullagh APG.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb 10; 125(2):216-220. PubMed ID: 32171489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Tooth morphology fusion technique is more accurate than conventional technique in transferring morphology of provisional to definitive screw-retained, implant-supported crown: A preliminary intervention study.
    Mino T, Kurosaki Y, Tokumoto K, Izumi K, Mitsumune H, Maekawa K, Ueda A, Nakano T, Sejima J, Kimura-Ono A, Kuboki T.
    J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Jan 16; 68(1):139-146. PubMed ID: 37211412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Use of provisional restorations to enhance soft-tissue contours for implant restorations.
    Chee WW, Donovan T.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1998 May 16; 19(5):481-6, 488-9; quiz 490. PubMed ID: 9693510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Restoring implants in the esthetic zone after sculpting and capturing the periimplant tissues in rest position: a clinical report.
    Spyropoulou PE, Razzoog M, Sierraalta M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec 16; 102(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 19961991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Management of the upper anterior single-tooth osseointegrated implant: a case presentation.
    Weinstock D, Rosenberg E.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1995 Oct 16; 16(10):988, 990, 992 passim; quiz 998. PubMed ID: 8603311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Dimensional Variations in the Soft Tissue Profile After Removal of Implant-Supported Fixed Interim Restorations: A Pilot Clinical Study.
    Duran JC, Aguirre F, Pino R, Velásquez D.
    Implant Dent; 2018 Feb 16; 27(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 29351112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Transitioning patients from teeth to implants utilizing fixed restorations.
    Jivraj S, Reshad M, Chee WW.
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Aug 16; 36(8):599-606. PubMed ID: 18814782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. A Technique for Duplicating the Contours of an Interim Implant Supported Crown to Fabricate a Custom Impression Coping and the Definitive Prosthesis.
    Vasconcellos F, Proussaefs P.
    Implant Dent; 2016 Dec 16; 25(6):861-865. PubMed ID: 27824718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.