These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

380 related items for PubMed ID: 32421657

  • 1. Adjacent segment biomechanical changes after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using either a zero-profile device or cage plus plate: A finite element analysis.
    Hua W, Zhi J, Ke W, Wang B, Yang S, Li L, Yang C.
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 May; 120():103760. PubMed ID: 32421657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.
    Hua W, Zhi J, Wang B, Ke W, Sun W, Yang S, Li L, Yang C.
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jun; 189():105352. PubMed ID: 31991316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Biomechanical effects on the intermediate segment of noncontiguous hybrid surgery with cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.
    Wu TK, Meng Y, Liu H, Wang BY, Hong Y, Rong X, Ding C, Chen H.
    Spine J; 2019 Jul; 19(7):1254-1263. PubMed ID: 30742975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical Effect of C5 /C6 Intervertebral Reconstructive Height on Adjacent Segments in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - A Finite Element Analysis.
    Zhou JM, Guo X, Kang L, Zhao R, Yang XT, Fu YB, Xue Y.
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1408-1416. PubMed ID: 33942538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biomechanical effect of endplate defects on the intermediate vertebral bone in consecutive two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.
    Zhang J, Chen W, Weng R, Liang D, Jiang X, Lin H.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 May 22; 24(1):407. PubMed ID: 37217909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel S-Type, Dynamic Zero-Profile Cage Design for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Variations in Bone Graft Shape: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Manickam PS, Roy S, Shetty GM.
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Oct 22; 154():e199-e214. PubMed ID: 34246827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Adjacent-level biomechanics after single-level anterior cervical interbody fusion with anchored zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate construct: a finite element study.
    Li XF, Jin LY, Liang CG, Yin HL, Song XX.
    BMC Surg; 2020 Apr 06; 20(1):66. PubMed ID: 32252742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Biomechanical performance of the novel assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A finite element analysis.
    Zhang X, Yang Y, Shen YW, Zhang KR, Ma LT, Ding C, Wang BY, Meng Y, Liu H.
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023 Apr 06; 11():931202. PubMed ID: 36970630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine.
    Healy AT, Sundar SJ, Cardenas RJ, Mageswaran P, Benzel EC, Mroz TE, Francis TB.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Nov 06; 21(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 25170655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC.
    Spine J; 2010 Apr 06; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biomechanical evaluation of the novel assembled internal fixed system in C2-C3 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.
    Chen H, Sun H, Cao L, Xia H, Tu Q.
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Feb 01; 19(1):106. PubMed ID: 38303025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Changes of adjacent segment biomechanics after anterior cervical interbody fusion with different profile design plate: single- versus double-level.
    Jin LY, Wei K, Feng DM, Li JD, Song XX, Yin HL, Li XF.
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2023 May 01; 26(6):744-753. PubMed ID: 35695468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study.
    Huang W, Tian Y, Wang H, Zou F, Ma X, Jiang J, Li R.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Sep 07; 23(1):848. PubMed ID: 36071416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Biomechanical Analysis of Hybrid Artificial Discs or Zero-Profile Devices for Treating 1-Level Adjacent Segment Degeneration in ACDF Revision Surgery.
    Liang W, Yang Y, Han B, Sun D, Yin P, Hai Y.
    Neurospine; 2024 Jun 07; 21(2):606-619. PubMed ID: 38955532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Biomechanical effect of different plate-to-disc distance on surgical and adjacent segment in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion - a finite element analysis.
    Guo X, Zhou J, Tian Y, Kang L, Xue Y.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Apr 09; 22(1):340. PubMed ID: 33836709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. External and internal responses of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A finite element modeling study.
    Purushothaman Y, Yoganandan N, Jebaseelan D, Choi H, Baisden J.
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Jun 09; 106():103735. PubMed ID: 32321632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Surgical Strategies for Skip-level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Finite Element Study.
    Xu H, Liu Z, Yang Y, Miao J, Wang B, Yang C.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Aug 15; 49(16):E262-E271. PubMed ID: 38800946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cage-screw and anterior plating combination reduces the risk of micromotion and subsidence in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion-a finite element study.
    Lin M, Shapiro SZ, Doulgeris J, Engeberg ED, Tsai CT, Vrionis FD.
    Spine J; 2021 May 15; 21(5):874-882. PubMed ID: 33460810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Can an Endplate-conformed Cervical Cage Provide a Better Biomechanical Environment than a Typical Non-conformed Cage?: A Finite Element Model and Cadaver Study.
    Zhang F, Xu HC, Yin B, Xia XL, Ma XS, Wang HL, Yin J, Shao MH, Lyu FZ, Jiang JY.
    Orthop Surg; 2016 Aug 15; 8(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 27627721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.