These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

309 related items for PubMed ID: 32423541

  • 1. Biomechanical evaluation of a new passive back support exoskeleton.
    Koopman AS, Näf M, Baltrusch SJ, Kingma I, Rodriguez-Guerrero C, Babič J, de Looze MP, van Dieën JH.
    J Biomech; 2020 May 22; 105():109795. PubMed ID: 32423541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. In-Field Training of a Passive Back Exoskeleton Changes the Biomechanics of Logistic Workers.
    Schrøder Jakobsen L, Samani A, Desbrosses K, de Zee M, Madeleine P.
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2024 May 22; 12(3):149-161. PubMed ID: 38869954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of control strategies for an active back-support exoskeleton on spine loading and kinematics during lifting.
    Koopman AS, Toxiri S, Power V, Kingma I, van Dieën JH, Ortiz J, de Looze MP.
    J Biomech; 2019 Jun 25; 91():14-22. PubMed ID: 31122661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effectiveness of Soft versus Rigid Back-Support Exoskeletons during a Lifting Task.
    Schwartz M, Theurel J, Desbrosses K.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul 29; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Biomechanical Analysis of Stoop and Free-Style Squat Lifting and Lowering with a Generic Back-Support Exoskeleton Model.
    Tröster M, Budde S, Maufroy C, Andersen MS, Rasmussen J, Schneider U, Bauernhansl T.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul 25; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 35897411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Biomechanical Consequences of Using Passive and Active Back-Support Exoskeletons during Different Manual Handling Tasks.
    Schwartz M, Desbrosses K, Theurel J, Mornieux G.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jul 28; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 37569010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting.
    Zhou X, Zheng L.
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2021 Jul 28; 9(3-4):167-185. PubMed ID: 34254566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Motor variability during a repetitive lifting task is impaired by wearing a passive back-support exoskeleton.
    Rimmele P, Steinhilber B, Rieger MA, Luger T.
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2023 Feb 28; 68():102739. PubMed ID: 36566692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A Lower-Back Exoskeleton With a Four-Bar Linkage Structure for Providing Extensor Moment and Lumbar Traction Force.
    Moon C, Bae J, Kwak J, Hong D.
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022 Feb 28; 30():729-737. PubMed ID: 35286262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.