These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography. Al-Murshedi S, Hogg P, England A. Br J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 91(1089):20180317. PubMed ID: 29906239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of varying X-ray tube voltage and additional filtration on image quality and patient dose in digital radiography system. E A, A Y, T O. Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Sep; 199():110893. PubMed ID: 37321050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation of contrast-detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study. De Crop A, Bacher K, Van Hoof T, Smeets PV, Smet BS, Vergauwen M, Kiendys U, Duyck P, Verstraete K, D'Herde K, Thierens H. Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):298-304. PubMed ID: 22056687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Survey of chest radiography systems: Any link between contrast detail measurements and visual grading analysis? Rodríguez Pérez S, Marshall NW, Binst J, Coolen J, Struelens L, Bosmans H. Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():62-71. PubMed ID: 32599376 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency. Bertolini M, Nitrosi A, Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Pattacini P, Ginocchi V, Iori M. Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2617-27. PubMed ID: 22559632 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation Between Contrast-Detail Analysis and Clinical Image Quality Assessment of Intrapulmonary Lesions in Dual-Energy Subtraction Chest Radiography Using the Two-Shot Method: A Phantom Study. Kuramoto T, Takarabe S, Kanzaki Y, Shibayama Y, Yamasaki Y, Kitamura Y. Acad Radiol; 2024 May; 31(5):2118-2127. PubMed ID: 38008645 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages. Sandborg M, Tingberg A, Ullman G, Dance DR, Alm Carlsson G. Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system. Moore CS, Wood TJ, Beavis AW, Saunderson JR. Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130077. PubMed ID: 23568362 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effective dose efficiency: an application-specific metric of quality and dose for digital radiography. Samei E, Ranger NT, Dobbins JT, Ravin CE. Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug 21; 56(16):5099-118. PubMed ID: 21775791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]