These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
239 related items for PubMed ID: 32469929
1. A simple method for the calculation of dialysis Kt factor as a quantitative measure of removal efficiency of uremic retention solutes: Applicability to high-dialysate vs low-dialysate volume technologies. Colussi G, Brunati CCM, Gervasi F, Montoli A, Vergani D, Curci F, Minetti E. PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233331. PubMed ID: 32469929 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of pre- and postdilutional on-line hemodiafiltration adequacy by partial dialysate quantification and on-line urea monitor. Lim PS, Lee HP, Kho B, Yu YL, Chang SC, Lin YY, Yang CC, Wang TH, Kuo SY, Lin LC. Blood Purif; 1999; 17(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 10494022 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Imprecision of the hemodialysis dose when measured directly from urea removal. Hemodialysis Study Group. Depner TA, Greene T, Gotch FA, Daugirdas JT, Keshaviah PR, Star RA. Kidney Int; 1999 Feb; 55(2):635-47. PubMed ID: 9987088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Single Session and Weekly Beta 2-Microglobulin Removal with Different Dialytic Procedures: Comparison between High-Flux Standard Bicarbonate Hemodialysis, Post-Dilution Hemodiafiltration, Short Frequent Hemodialysis with NxStage Technology and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis. Brunati CCM, Gervasi F, Cabibbe M, Ravera F, Menegotto A, Querques M, Colussi G. Blood Purif; 2019 Feb; 48(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 31055574 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Two spent dialysate samples are sufficient for hemodialysis efficacy assessment. Kovacic V, Ljutic D. Int J Artif Organs; 2005 Jan; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 15742306 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of high-efficiency and standard haemodialysis providing equal urea clearances by partial and total dialysate quantification. Mactier RA, Madi AM, Allam BF. Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1997 Jun; 12(6):1182-6. PubMed ID: 9198048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of delivered dialysis dose by on-line monitoring of the ultraviolet absorbance in the spent dialysate. Uhlin F, Fridolin I, Lindberg LG, Magnusson M. Am J Kidney Dis; 2003 May; 41(5):1026-36. PubMed ID: 12722037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Urea kinetics during sustained low-efficiency dialysis in critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy. Marshall MR, Golper TA, Shaver MJ, Alam MG, Chatoth DK. Am J Kidney Dis; 2002 Mar; 39(3):556-70. PubMed ID: 11877575 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Chronic hemodialysis: Kt/V or solute removal index to evaluate the effective delivered dose? Di Filippo S, Manzoni C, Corti M, Locatelli F. Int J Artif Organs; 1998 Sep; 21(9):509-14. PubMed ID: 9828055 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Dialysis dose (Kt/V) and clearance variation sensitivity using measurement of ultraviolet-absorbance (on-line), blood urea, dialysate urea and ionic dialysance. Uhlin F, Fridolin I, Magnusson M, Lindberg LG. Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2225-31. PubMed ID: 16611681 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of methods to predict equilibrated Kt/V in the HEMO Pilot Study. Daugirdas JT, Depner TA, Gotch FA, Greene T, Keshaviah P, Levin NW, Schulman G. Kidney Int; 1997 Nov; 52(5):1395-405. PubMed ID: 9350665 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Solute kinetics with short-daily home hemodialysis using slow dialysate flow rate. Kohn OF, Coe FL, Ing TS. Hemodial Int; 2010 Jan; 14(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 19758296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of hemodialysis duration on the removal of uremic retention solutes. Eloot S, Van Biesen W, Dhondt A, Van de Wynkele H, Glorieux G, Verdonck P, Vanholder R. Kidney Int; 2008 Mar; 73(6):765-70. PubMed ID: 18160958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Precise quantification of dialysis using continuous sampling of spent dialysate and total dialysate volume measurement. Argilés A, Ficheux A, Thomas M, Bosc JY, Kerr PG, Lorho R, Flavier JL, Stec F, Adelé C, Leblanc M, Garred LJ, Canaud B, Mion H, Mion CM. Kidney Int; 1997 Aug; 52(2):530-7. PubMed ID: 9264013 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Removal of Urea, β2-Microglobulin, and Indoxyl Sulfate Assessed by Absorbance and Fluorescence in the Spent Dialysate During Hemodialysis. Lauri K, Arund J, Holmar J, Tanner R, Kalle S, Luman M, Fridolin I. ASAIO J; 2020 Jun; 66(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 31425267 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Determination of the dose of dialysis with integrated modules in the same monitor]. Torregrosa E, Hernández-Jaras J, García-Pérez H, Pons-Prades R, Calvo-Gordo C, Ríus-Peris A, Sánchez-Canel JJ, Pin-Godos M. Nefrologia; 2006 Jun; 26(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 16808263 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of high-flux hemodiafiltration efficiency using an on-line urea monitor. Canaud B, Bosc JY, Leblanc M, Garred LJ, Vo T, Mion C. Am J Kidney Dis; 1998 Jan; 31(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 9428455 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Is Fluorescence Valid to Monitor Removal of Protein Bound Uremic Solutes in Dialysis? Arund J, Luman M, Uhlin F, Tanner R, Fridolin I. PLoS One; 2016 Jan; 11(5):e0156541. PubMed ID: 27228162 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Con-Current versus Counter-Current Dialysate Flow during CVVHD. A Comparative Study for Creatinine and Urea Removal. Baldwin I, Baldwin M, Fealy N, Neri M, Garzotto F, Kim JC, Giuliani A, Basso F, Nalesso F, Brendolan A, Ronco C. Blood Purif; 2016 Jan; 41(1-3):171-6. PubMed ID: 26764970 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Studies on dialysate mixing in the Genius single-pass batch system for hemodialysis therapy. Dhondt AW, Vanholder RC, De Smet RV, Claus SA, Waterloos MA, Glorieux GL, Delanghe JR, Lameire NH. Kidney Int; 2003 Apr; 63(4):1540-7. PubMed ID: 12631371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]