These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

394 related items for PubMed ID: 32473834

  • 1. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.
    Dejak B, Młotkowski A.
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation.
    Dejak B, Młotkowski A.
    Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):e309-17. PubMed ID: 24157244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A, Romanowicz M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Helal MA, Wang Z.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):988-996. PubMed ID: 29067737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello P, Rengo S, Davidson CL, Watts DC.
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
    Magne P, Belser UC.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of different endodontic access preparations on the biomechanical behavior of lithium disilicate and resin nanoceramic onlay restorations: An in vitro and 3D finite element analysis study.
    Lai H, Lin X, Zhang Y, Gong Q, Tong Z.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 35216818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
    Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, Fabianelli A, Gloria A, Martorelli M, Lanzotti A, Watts DC.
    Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars.
    Vianna ALSV, Prado CJD, Bicalho AA, Pereira RADS, Neves FDD, Soares CJ.
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Jun; 26():e20180004. PubMed ID: 30133672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of Inlays, Onlays and Endocrown Cavity Design Preparation on Fracture Resistance and Fracture Mode of Endodontically Treated Teeth: An In Vitro Study.
    Kassis C, Khoury P, Mehanna CZ, Baba NZ, Bou Chebel F, Daou M, Hardan L.
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Aug; 30(7):625-631. PubMed ID: 33219727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis.
    Skalskyi V, Makeev V, Stankevych O, Pavlychko R.
    Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Biomechanical behavior and Weibull survival of CAD-CAM endocrowns with different marginal designs: A 3D finite element analysis.
    AboElhassan RG, Watts DC, Alamoush RA, Elraggal A.
    Dent Mater; 2024 Feb; 40(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 37977990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.