These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
160 related items for PubMed ID: 32493283
1. Adjunct use of mouth rinses with a sonic toothbrush accelerates the detachment of a Streptococcus mutans biofilm: an in vitro study. Ohsumi T, Takenaka S, Sakaue Y, Suzuki Y, Nagata R, Hasegawa T, Ohshima H, Terao Y, Noiri Y. BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun 03; 20(1):161. PubMed ID: 32493283 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of sonic vibration of an ultrasonic toothbrush on the removal of Streptococcus mutans biofilm from enamel surface. Hashizume LN, Dariva A. Am J Dent; 2015 Dec 03; 28(6):347-50. PubMed ID: 26846041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of efficacy of 0.2% Chlorhexidine, Listerine and Tulsi extract mouth rinses on salivary Streptococcus mutans count of high school children--RCT. Agarwal P, Nagesh L. Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Nov 03; 32(6):802-8. PubMed ID: 21763461 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Interproximal biofilm removal by intervallic use of a sonic toothbrush compared to an oral irrigation system. Tawakoli PN, Sauer B, Becker K, Buchalla W, Attin T. BMC Oral Health; 2015 Aug 05; 15():91. PubMed ID: 26243234 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of Listerine and Corsodyl on orthodontic brackets in vitro. Chen Y, Wong RW, Seneviratne CJ, Hägg U, McGrath C, Samaranayake LP. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct 05; 140(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 21967942 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus colony count changes in saliva following chlorhexidine (0.12%) mouth rinse, combination mouth rinse, and green tea extract (0.5%) mouth rinse in children. Hegde RJ, Kamath S. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017 Oct 05; 35(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 28492194 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro comparison of commercial oral rinses on bacterial adhesion and their detachment from biofilm formed on hydroxyapatite disks. Babu JP, Garcia-Godoy F. Oral Health Prev Dent; 2014 Oct 05; 12(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 24624400 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of a mouthrinse containing Malva sylvestris on the viability and activity of microcosm biofilm and on enamel demineralization compared to known antimicrobials mouthrinses. Braga AS, Pires JG, Magalhães AC. Biofouling; 2018 Mar 05; 34(3):252-261. PubMed ID: 29430962 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of chlorhexidine mouth rinse on Streptococci counts of tooth-tissue-borne palatal expander biofilm. Maruo IT, Rosa EA, Maruo H, Tanaka O, Guariza Filho O, Ignácio SA, Camargo ES. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Aug 05; 11(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 18713150 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of three different formulations of mouth rinses with multi-herbal mouth rinse. Jain I, Jain P. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016 Aug 05; 34(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 27681394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of a mouthrinse based on hydroxyapatite to reduce initial bacterial colonisation in situ. Kensche A, Holder C, Basche S, Tahan N, Hannig C, Hannig M. Arch Oral Biol; 2017 Aug 05; 80():18-26. PubMed ID: 28364672 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]