These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

240 related items for PubMed ID: 32493624

  • 1. In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.
    Soares Tenório KC, Neupmann Feres MF, Tanaka CJ, Augusto MKM, Rodrigues JA, Pereira da Silva HD, Arana-Chavez VE, Roscoe MG.
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):546-554. PubMed ID: 32493624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.
    Thawaba AA, Albelasy NF, Elsherbini AM, Hafez AM.
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul 13; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs.
    Garg R, Dixit P, Khosla T, Gupta P, Kalra H, Kumar P.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May 01; 19(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 29807961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of Enamel Surface Roughness after Bracket Debonding and Adhesive Resin Removal Using Different Burs with and without the Aid of a Magnifying Loupe.
    Thawaba AA, Albelasy NF, Elsherbini AM, Hafez AM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov 01; 23(11):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 37073931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
    Fan XC, Chen L, Huang XF.
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb 27; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.
    Vidor MM, Felix RP, Marchioro EM, Hahn L.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Feb 27; 20(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 25992989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system.
    Ghaleb L, Al-Worafi NA, Thawaba A, Abdulqader AA, Alkamel A, Abdo Y, Yang Z, Noman N, Al-Aroomi MA, Yulou T.
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar 20; 24(1):358. PubMed ID: 38509532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of different orthodontic adhesives and resin removal techniques on enamel color alteration.
    Boncuk Y, Cehreli ZC, Polat-Özsoy Ö.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul 20; 84(4):634-41. PubMed ID: 24313735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding.
    Cardoso LA, Valdrighi HC, Vedovello Filho M, Correr AB.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014 Jul 20; 19(6):105-12. PubMed ID: 25628087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Enamel surface roughness after debonding.
    Karan S, Kircelli BH, Tasdelen B.
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Nov 20; 80(6):1081-8. PubMed ID: 20677958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Enamel surface roughness following debonding resin clean up using high speed air-turbine and electric handpieces. In vitro study.
    Yousry TN, Abolgheit S, Kassem HE.
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 May 25; 24(1):609. PubMed ID: 38796434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of enamel surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding with atomic force microscopy.
    Mohebi S, Shafiee HA, Ameli N.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar 25; 151(3):521-527. PubMed ID: 28257737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite enamel and composite dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part I: roughness after treatments with tungsten carbide vs diamond burs.
    Ferraris F, Conti A.
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014 Mar 25; 9(1):70-89. PubMed ID: 24757700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. In-vivo evaluation of the surface roughness and morphology of enamel after bracket removal and polishing by different techniques.
    Faria-Júnior ÉM, Guiraldo RD, Berger SB, Correr AB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Contreras EF, Lopes MB.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar 25; 147(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 25726399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro.
    Ryf S, Flury S, Palaniappan S, Lussi A, van Meerbeek B, Zimmerli B.
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb 25; 34(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21228118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Tooth color change due to different etching and debonding procedures.
    Gorucu-Coskuner H, Atik E, Taner T.
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Nov 25; 88(6):779-784. PubMed ID: 30080125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Enamel surface roughness of preferred debonding and polishing protocols.
    Webb BJ, Koch J, Hagan JL, Ballard RW, Armbruster PC.
    J Orthod; 2016 Mar 25; 43(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 26282121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods.
    Eliades T, Gioka C, Eliades G, Makou M.
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun 25; 26(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 15222720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite-enamel and composite-dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part II: roughness with diamond finishing and differences between enamel composite vs body composite.
    Ferraris F, Conti A.
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014 Jun 25; 9(2):184-204. PubMed ID: 24765626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding.
    Ulusoy C.
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2009 Jun 25; 17(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19466253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.