These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

184 related items for PubMed ID: 32495531

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K, Parker KE, Cheng H, Applegate RA.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children.
    Martinez AA, Pandian A, Sankaridurg P, Rose K, Huynh SC, Mitchell P.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):811-7. PubMed ID: 17106401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Design and validity of a miniaturized open-field aberrometer.
    Bhatt UK, Sheppard AL, Shah S, Dua HS, Mihashi T, Yamaguchi T, Wolffsohn JS.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jan; 39(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 23107833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.
    Bennett JR, Stalboerger GM, Hodge DO, Schornack MM.
    J Optom; 2015 Jan; 8(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25498534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of the SVOne Handheld Autorefractor in a Pediatric Population.
    Rosenfield M, Ciuffreda KJ.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 27668640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
    Lebow KA, Campbell CE.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Utility of an open field Shack-Hartmann aberrometer for measurement of refractive error in infants and young children.
    Harvey EM, Miller JM, Schwiegerling J.
    J AAPOS; 2013 Oct; 17(5):494-500. PubMed ID: 24160970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Agreement and Repeatability of Noncycloplegic and Cycloplegic Wavefront-based Autorefraction in Children.
    Rauscher FG, Lange H, Yahiaoui-Doktor M, Tegetmeyer H, Sterker I, Hinz A, Wahl S, Wiedemann P, Ohlendorf A, Blendowske R.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Nov; 96(11):879-889. PubMed ID: 31703049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison between wavefront-derived refraction and auto-refraction.
    Yakar K, Kan E, Duran M.
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Dec; 44():103712. PubMed ID: 37459941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of monochromatic aberrations in young adults with different visual acuity and refractive errors.
    Yazar S, Hewitt AW, Forward H, McKnight CM, Tan A, Mountain JA, Mackey DA.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 24417894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. An evaluation of the Bausch & Lomb Zywave aberrometer.
    Dobos MJ, Twa MD, Bullimore MA.
    Clin Exp Optom; 2009 May; 92(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 19469012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of cycloplegia on the measurement of refractive error in Chinese children.
    Li T, Zhou X, Zhu J, Tang X, Gu X.
    Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 30136309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.