These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

180 related items for PubMed ID: 32509439

  • 1. Factors Predicting a Greater Likelihood of Poor Visual Field Reliability in Glaucoma Patients and Suspects.
    Aboobakar IF, Wang J, Chauhan BC, Boland MV, Friedman DS, Ramulu PY, Yohannan J.
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 32509439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evidence-based Criteria for Assessment of Visual Field Reliability.
    Yohannan J, Wang J, Brown J, Chauhan BC, Boland MV, Friedman DS, Ramulu PY.
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Nov; 124(11):1612-1620. PubMed ID: 28676280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Effect of Transitioning from SITA Standard to SITA Faster on Visual Field Performance.
    Pham AT, Ramulu PY, Boland MV, Yohannan J.
    Ophthalmology; 2021 Oct; 128(10):1417-1425. PubMed ID: 33798655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Effect of Testing Reliability on Visual Field Sensitivity in Normal Eyes: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study.
    Tan NYQ, Tham YC, Koh V, Nguyen DQ, Cheung CY, Aung T, Wong TY, Cheng CY.
    Ophthalmology; 2018 Jan; 125(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 28863943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Predictors of Long-Term Visual Field Fluctuation in Glaucoma Patients.
    Rabiolo A, Morales E, Kim JH, Afifi AA, Yu F, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J.
    Ophthalmology; 2020 Jun; 127(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 31952885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Performance of the visual field index in glaucoma patients with moderately advanced visual field loss.
    Lee JM, Cirineo N, Ramanathan M, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Morales E, Coleman AL, Caprioli J.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 157(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 24200229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparing glaucoma progression on 24-2 and 10-2 visual field examinations.
    Rao HL, Begum VU, Khadka D, Mandal AK, Senthil S, Garudadri CS.
    PLoS One; 2015 Jan; 10(5):e0127233. PubMed ID: 25978316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Frontloading Fields Study: The Impact of False Positives and Seeding Point Errors on Visual Field Reliability When Using SITA-Faster.
    Phu J, Kalloniatis M.
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Feb 01; 11(2):20. PubMed ID: 35142783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma.
    Rao HL, Kumar AU, Babu JG, Senthil S, Garudadri CS.
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Feb 01; 118(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 20728941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of focal lamina cribrosa defect on glaucomatous visual field progression.
    Faridi OS, Park SC, Kabadi R, Su D, De Moraes CG, Liebmann JM, Ritch R.
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug 01; 121(8):1524-30. PubMed ID: 24697910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluating the accuracy of the visual field index for the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma.
    Talbot R, Goldberg I, Kelly P.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec 01; 156(6):1272-6. PubMed ID: 24075425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Estimating the Reliability of Glaucomatous Visual Field for the Accurate Assessment of Progression Using the Gaze-Tracking and Reliability Indices.
    Asaoka R, Fujino Y, Aoki S, Matsuura M, Murata H.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019 Dec 01; 2(2):111-119. PubMed ID: 32672604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Association Between Clinical Features Seen on Fundus Photographs and Glaucomatous Damage Detected on Visual Fields and Optical Coherence Tomography Scans.
    Alhadeff PA, De Moraes CG, Chen M, Raza AS, Ritch R, Hood DC.
    J Glaucoma; 2017 May 01; 26(5):498-504. PubMed ID: 28333890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Predicting eyes at risk for rapid glaucoma progression based on an initial visual field test using machine learning.
    Shuldiner SR, Boland MV, Ramulu PY, De Moraes CG, Elze T, Myers J, Pasquale L, Wellik S, Yohannan J.
    PLoS One; 2021 May 01; 16(4):e0249856. PubMed ID: 33861775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Misleading statistical calculations in far-advanced glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Blumenthal EZ, Sapir-Pichhadze R.
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Jan 01; 110(1):196-200. PubMed ID: 12511366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Predicting Global Test-Retest Variability of Visual Fields in Glaucoma.
    Choi EY, Li D, Fan Y, Pasquale LR, Shen LQ, Boland MV, Ramulu P, Yousefi S, De Moraes CG, Wellik SR, Myers JS, Bex PJ, Elze T, Wang M.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2021 Jan 01; 4(4):390-399. PubMed ID: 33310194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The Usefulness of Gaze Tracking as an Index of Visual Field Reliability in Glaucoma Patients.
    Ishiyama Y, Murata H, Asaoka R.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Oct 01; 56(11):6233-6. PubMed ID: 26431476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.