These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

210 related items for PubMed ID: 32583220

  • 1. Prealbumin and D-dimer as Prognostic Indicators for Rebleeding in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Yue W, Liu Y, Jiang W, Huang J, Liu J.
    Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Jun; 66(6):1949-1956. PubMed ID: 32583220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
    Rout G, Sharma S, Gunjan D, Kedia S, Nayak B, Shalimar.
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS, Choi J, Shin WC.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul 26; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV, Thulaseedharan NK, Raj R, Unnikrishnan DC, Jacob A.
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug 26; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Chang A, Ouejiaraphant C, Akarapatima K, Rattanasupa A, Prachayakul V.
    Clin Endosc; 2021 Mar 26; 54(2):211-221. PubMed ID: 32668528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Lu X, Zhang X, Chen H.
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Jun 26; 112(6):467-473. PubMed ID: 32379473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A, Gharibpoor F, Mahdipour Z, Samadani AA.
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec 01; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
    Robertson M, Ng J, Abu Shawish W, Swaine A, Skardoon G, Huynh A, Deshpande S, Low ZY, Sievert W, Angus P.
    Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul 01; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Park SM, Yeum SC, Kim BW, Kim JS, Kim JH, Sim EH, Ji JS, Choi H.
    Gut Liver; 2016 Jul 15; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M, Majumdar A, Boyapati R, Chung W, Worland T, Terbah R, Wei J, Lontos S, Angus P, Vaughan R.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun 15; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E, Yılmaz S, Doğan NÖ, Pekdemir M.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan 15; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.
    Tantai XX, Liu N, Yang LB, Wei ZC, Xiao CL, Song YH, Wang JH.
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec 07; 25(45):6668-6680. PubMed ID: 31832005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L, Xu F, Yuan J.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun 28; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, Yam C, Schoeman MN, Holloway RH, Nguyen NQ.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct 28; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, Ngu JH, Schultz M, Abazi R, Zakko L, Thornton S, Wilkinson K, Khor CJ, Murray IA, Laursen SB, International Gastrointestinal Bleeding Consortium.
    BMJ; 2017 Jan 04; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Far from an ideal score.
    Aluizio CLS, Montes CG, Reis GFSR, Nagasako CK.
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021 Jan 04; 76():e2921. PubMed ID: 34190855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
    Chen IC, Hung MS, Chiu TF, Chen JC, Hsiao CT.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep 04; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of risk scores and shock index in hemodynamically stable patients presenting to the emergency department with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Jung DH, Ko BS, Kim YJ, Kim WY.
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Jul 04; 31(7):781-785. PubMed ID: 31008809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
    Yang HM, Jeon SW, Jung JT, Lee DW, Ha CY, Park KS, Lee SH, Yang CH, Park JH, Park YS, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Gastrointestinal Study Group (DGSG).
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Jan 04; 31(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 26211939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Outcomes and Risk Assessment of Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Rajavithi Hospital, Thailand.
    Bunchorntavakul C, Yodket Y, Singhasena N.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2017 Feb 04; 100 Suppl 1():S104-15. PubMed ID: 29927224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.