These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

336 related items for PubMed ID: 32613244

  • 21. Changes in occlusal surface area and occlusal force distribution following the wear of vacuum-formed, hawley and bonded retainers: A controlled clinical trial.
    Alkan Ö, Kaya Y.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Jun; 47(6):766-774. PubMed ID: 32242981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Survival analysis of orthodontic retainers.
    Jin C, Bennani F, Gray A, Farella M, Mei L.
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Sep 28; 40(5):531-536. PubMed ID: 29370399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. No differences seen in outcomes between three different methods of orthodontic retention.
    Walker M.
    Evid Based Dent; 2013 Sep 28; 14(3):81-2. PubMed ID: 24071676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) versus dead-soft coaxial bonded retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Part 1. Stability, retainer failure, and participant satisfaction.
    Jasim ES, Kadhum AS.
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Oct 01; 46(5):. PubMed ID: 39206494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainer versus a chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Jowett AC, Littlewood SJ, Hodge TM, Dhaliwal HK, Wu J.
    J Orthod; 2023 Mar 01; 50(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 36062600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Comparison of chairside rectangular chain retainers and multi-stranded conventional retainers: a randomized controlled trial.
    Waldenström S, Qaljaee J, Bresin A, Esmaili S, Westerlund A.
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug 01; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 39011818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Five-year postretention outcomes of three retention methods--a randomized controlled trial.
    Edman Tynelius G, Petrén S, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E.
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug 01; 37(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 25452629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Factors affecting stability after fixed orthodontic treatment].
    Ren SS, Dai X, Ying M, Wang WX, Chang J, Hou ZM.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Sep 09; 53(9):599-603. PubMed ID: 30196619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Stability, survival, and patient satisfaction with CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 6-month follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Gera A, Pullisaar H, Cattaneo PM, Gera S, Vandevska-Radunovic V, Cornelis MA.
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Feb 10; 45(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 35964235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. 3D-analysis of unwanted tooth movements despite bonded orthodontic retainers: a pilot study.
    Klaus K, Xirouchaki F, Ruf S.
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Nov 04; 20(1):308. PubMed ID: 33148238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effects of three orthodontic retainers on periodontal pathogens and periodontal parameters.
    Li B, Lu C, Yao X, Wu X, Wu G, Zeng X.
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov 24; 13(1):20709. PubMed ID: 38001102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Orthodontic retention--three methods trialed.
    Cope JF, Lamont T.
    Evid Based Dent; 2016 Mar 24; 17(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 27012577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The retention characteristics of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers with different retention protocols.
    Ramazanzadeh B, Ahrari F, Hosseini ZS.
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Mar 24; 10(3):e224-e231. PubMed ID: 29721222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction: Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers.
    Hichens L, Rowland H, Williams A, Hollinghurst S, Ewings P, Clark S, Ireland A, Sandy J.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug 24; 29(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 17702797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of efficacy of thermoplastic retainer with round and rectangular bonded lingual wire retainer in the mandible two years after orthodontic treatment: a randomised controlled trial.
    Kanizaj Ugrin S, Špalj S.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Mar 01; 28(3):183. PubMed ID: 38424224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. ORTHODONTIC RETENTION. Studies of retention capacity, cost-effectiveness and long-term stability.
    Tynelius GE.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2014 Mar 01; (236):9-65. PubMed ID: 26685634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Comparison of post-treatment changes with and without retention in adolescents treated for maxillary impacted canines-a randomized controlled trial.
    Naraghi S, Ganzer N, Bondemark L, Sonesson M.
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr 03; 43(2):121-127. PubMed ID: 32133486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Rowland H, Hichens L, Williams A, Hills D, Killingback N, Ewings P, Clark S, Ireland AJ, Sandy JR.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec 03; 132(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 18068589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Removable thermoplastic appliances as orthodontic retainers--a prospective study of different wear regimens.
    Jäderberg S, Feldmann I, Engström C.
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Aug 03; 34(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 21508267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A two-year comparative assessment of retention of arch width increases between modified vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: a multi-center randomized clinical trial.
    Ashari A, Nik Mustapha NM, Yuen JJX, Saw ZK, Lau MN, Xian L, Syed Mohamed AMF, Megat Abdul Wahab R, Yeoh CK, Deva Tata M, Sinnasamy S.
    Prog Orthod; 2022 Aug 26; 23(1):40. PubMed ID: 36018418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.