These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
46. Failure frequency of fixed mandibular retainers after pre-treatment of the enamel surface with pumice versus sandblasting-a randomized controlled trial. Padula T, Wilhelmsson T, Naoumova J. Eur J Orthod; 2023 Nov 30; 45(6):637-644. PubMed ID: 37032532 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Stability, survival, patient satisfaction, and cost-minimization of CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 2-year follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled trial. Pullisaar H, Cattaneo PM, Gera A, Sankiewicz M, Bilińska M, Vandevska-Radunovic V, Cornelis MA. Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr 01; 46(2):. PubMed ID: 38394353 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Performance of clear vacuum-formed thermoplastic retainers depending on retention protocol: a systematic review. Kaklamanos EG, Kourakou M, Kloukos D, Doulis I, Kavvadia S. Odontology; 2017 Apr 01; 105(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 27270920 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone versus dead-soft coaxial bonded retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Part 2: periodontal health and microbial biofilm assessment. Jasim ES, Kadhum AS. Eur J Orthod; 2024 Oct 01; 46(5):. PubMed ID: 39312715 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Anterior tooth alignment: A comparison of orthodontic retention regimens 5 years posttreatment. Bjering R, Birkeland K, Vandevska-Radunovic V. Angle Orthod; 2015 May 01; 85(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 25140669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Computerized occlusal analysis of Essix and Hawley retainers used during the retention phase: a controlled clinical trial. Alkan Ö, Kaya Y, Keskin S. J Orofac Orthop; 2020 Sep 01; 81(5):371-381. PubMed ID: 32472340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Relapse and failure rates between CAD/CAM and conventional fixed retainers: a 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Tran G, Rucker R, Foley P, Bankhead B, Adel SM, Kim KB. Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan 01; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 38168815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Microbial adherence on vacuum-formed retainers with different surface roughness as constructed from conventional stone models and 3D printed models: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Belayutham S, Wan Hassan WN, Razak FA, Mohd Tahir NNZ. Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun 01; 27(6):3245-3259. PubMed ID: 36947263 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. "Clinical comparison of bond failure rate between two types of mandibular canine-canine bonded orthodontic retainers- a randomized clinical trial". Nagani NI, Ahmed I, Tanveer F, Khursheed HM, Farooqui WA. BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun 29; 20(1):180. PubMed ID: 32600325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures. Padmos JAD, Fudalej PS, Renkema AM. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr 29; 153(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 29602341 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Post-treatment stability, survival time and periodontal health associated with vacuum-formed, bonded and rapid prototype retainers: A prospective clinical study. Murugaiyan S, Pottipalli Sathyanarayana H, Thakkar D, Padmanabhan S. J Orthod; 2024 Jun 10; ():14653125241255702. PubMed ID: 38859624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. "Comparing the effectiveness, acceptability and oral hygiene status between vacuum formed retainer and Begg's retainer": a pilot study. Patnaik P, Nanda SB, Mishra S. BMC Oral Health; 2023 May 09; 23(1):266. PubMed ID: 37161557 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Patient compliance with orthodontic retainers in the postretention phase. Pratt MC, Kluemper GT, Lindstrom AF. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug 09; 140(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 21803257 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]