These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems. Marongiu G, Leinardi L, Congia S, Frigau L, Mola F, Capone A. J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar 12; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D-radiographic analysis does not improve the Neer and AO classifications of proximal humeral fractures. Sjödén GO, Movin T, Aspelin P, Güntner P, Shalabi A. Acta Orthop Scand; 1999 Aug 06; 70(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 10569259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver agreement of Neer and AO classifications for proximal humeral fractures. Papakonstantinou MK, Hart MJ, Farrugia R, Gabbe BJ, Kamali Moaveni A, van Bavel D, Page RS, Richardson MD. ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr 06; 86(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 26887373 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Neer classification to the 2018 update of the Orthopedic Trauma Association/AO fracture classification for classifying proximal humerus fractures. Marmor MT, Agel J, Dumpe J, Kellam JF, Marecek GS, Meinberg E, Nguyen MP, Sims S, Soles GL, Karam MD. OTA Int; 2022 Sep 06; 5(3):e200. PubMed ID: 36425090 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. INTER/INTRA-OBSERVER EVALUATION BETWEEN RADIOGRAPHS AND TOMOGRAPHIES FOR PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURE. Stirma GA, Secundino AR, Gonzalez GFG, Sola WC, de Souza GAL, Dau L. Acta Ortop Bras; 2020 Sep 06; 28(1):36-39. PubMed ID: 32095111 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver reliability of classification and characterization of proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of two and three-dimensional CT. Bruinsma WE, Guitton TG, Warner JJ, Ring D, Science of Variation Group. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Sep 04; 95(17):1600-4. PubMed ID: 24005201 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D-printed Handheld Models Do Not Improve Recognition of Specific Characteristics and Patterns of Three-part and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures. Spek RWA, Schoolmeesters BJA, Oosterhoff JHF, Doornberg JN, van den Bekerom MPJ, Jaarsma RL, Eygendaal D, IJpma F, Traumaplatform 3D Consortium. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jan 01; 480(1):150-159. PubMed ID: 34427569 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Do thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries classification systems exhibit lower inter- and intra-observer agreement than other fractures classifications?: A comparison using fractures of the trochanteric area of the proximal femur as contrast model. Urrutia J, Zamora T, Klaber I, Carmona M, Palma J, Campos M, Yurac R. Injury; 2016 Apr 01; 47(4):859-64. PubMed ID: 26653269 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 'Absolute' inter-observer classifications agreement for proximal humeral fractures with a single shoulder anteroposterior X-ray. Martínez-Sola R, León-Muñoz VJ, Najem-Rizk AN, Soler-Vasco B, Arrieta-Martínez CJ, López-Sorroche E, Cárdenas-Grande E, Salmerón-Vélez G, Ruiz-Molina JÁ, Martínez-Martínez F, Santonja-Medina F. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2021 Apr 01; 29(2):23094990211010520. PubMed ID: 33896261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]