These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

121 related items for PubMed ID: 32658320

  • 1. Predicting biofilm deformation with a viscoelastic phase-field model: Modeling and experimental studies.
    Li M, Matouš K, Nerenberg R.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2020 Nov; 117(11):3486-3498. PubMed ID: 32658320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Viscoelastic fluid description of bacterial biofilm material properties.
    Klapper I, Rupp CJ, Cargo R, Purvedorj B, Stoodley P.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2002 Nov 05; 80(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 12226861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Data-driven modeling of heterogeneous viscoelastic biofilms.
    Li M, Matouš K, Nerenberg R.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2022 May 05; 119(5):1301-1313. PubMed ID: 35129209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Spatial distribution of mechanical properties in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms, and their potential impacts on biofilm deformation.
    Pavissich JP, Li M, Nerenberg R.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2021 Apr 05; 118(4):1564-1575. PubMed ID: 33415727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Viscoelastic properties of a mixed culture biofilm from rheometer creep analysis.
    Towler BW, Rupp CJ, Cunningham AB, Stoodley P.
    Biofouling; 2003 Oct 05; 19(5):279-85. PubMed ID: 14650082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Absolute quantitation of bacterial biofilm adhesion and viscoelasticity by microbead force spectroscopy.
    Lau PC, Dutcher JR, Beveridge TJ, Lam JS.
    Biophys J; 2009 Apr 08; 96(7):2935-48. PubMed ID: 19348775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of biofilm heterogeneity on the apparent mechanical properties obtained by shear rheometry.
    Li M, Nahum Y, Matouš K, Stoodley P, Nerenberg R.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2023 Feb 08; 120(2):553-561. PubMed ID: 36305479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Description of mechanical response including detachment using a novel particle model of biofilm/flow interaction.
    Alpkvist E, Klapper I.
    Water Sci Technol; 2007 Feb 08; 55(8-9):265-73. PubMed ID: 17546995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Structural deformation of bacterial biofilms caused by short-term fluctuations in fluid shear: an in situ investigation of biofilm rheology.
    Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z, Boyle JD, Lappin-Scott HM.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 Oct 05; 65(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 10440674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Coupled CFD-DEM modeling to predict how EPS affects bacterial biofilm deformation, recovery and detachment under flow conditions.
    Xia Y, Jayathilake PG, Li B, Zuliani P, Deehan D, Longyear J, Stoodley P, Chen J.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2022 Sep 05; 119(9):2551-2563. PubMed ID: 35610631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Time-resolved biofilm deformation measurements using optical coherence tomography.
    Blauert F, Horn H, Wagner M.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2015 Sep 05; 112(9):1893-905. PubMed ID: 25786671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Computational and Experimental Investigation of Biofilm Disruption Dynamics Induced by High-Velocity Gas Jet Impingement.
    Prades L, Fabbri S, Dorado AD, Gamisans X, Stoodley P, Picioreanu C.
    mBio; 2020 Jan 07; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 31911489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Multicomponent model of deformation and detachment of a biofilm under fluid flow.
    Tierra G, Pavissich JP, Nerenberg R, Xu Z, Alber MS.
    J R Soc Interface; 2015 May 06; 12(106):. PubMed ID: 25808342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Determination of mechanical properties of biofilms by modelling the deformation measured using optical coherence tomography.
    Picioreanu C, Blauert F, Horn H, Wagner M.
    Water Res; 2018 Nov 15; 145():588-598. PubMed ID: 30199803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Chemical and antimicrobial treatments change the viscoelastic properties of bacterial biofilms.
    Jones WL, Sutton MP, McKittrick L, Stewart PS.
    Biofouling; 2011 Feb 15; 27(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 21279860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Biofilm viscoelasticity and nutrient source location control biofilm growth rate, migration rate, and morphology in shear flow.
    Nguyen H, Ybarra A, Başağaoğlu H, Shindell O.
    Sci Rep; 2021 Aug 09; 11(1):16118. PubMed ID: 34373534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Emergence of a limit cycle for swimming microorganisms in a vortical flow of a viscoelastic fluid.
    Ardekani AM, Gore E.
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 May 09; 85(5 Pt 2):056309. PubMed ID: 23004864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Metabolic modeling of a chronic wound biofilm consortium predicts spatial partitioning of bacterial species.
    Phalak P, Chen J, Carlson RP, Henson MA.
    BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Sep 07; 10(1):90. PubMed ID: 27604263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A model of fluid-biofilm interaction using a Burger material law.
    Towler BW, Cunningham A, Stoodley P, McKittrick L.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Feb 01; 96(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 16933369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.