These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


179 related items for PubMed ID: 32678877

  • 41. Speed gradients and the perception of surface slant: analysis is two-dimensional not one-dimensional.
    Meese TS, Harris MG, Freeman TC.
    Vision Res; 1995 Oct; 35(20):2879-88. PubMed ID: 8533327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Interaction of stereo, texture and outline cues in the shape perception of three-dimensional ridges.
    Buckley D, Frisby JP.
    Vision Res; 1993 May; 33(7):919-33. PubMed ID: 8506635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Stereoscopic Slant Contrast and the Perception of Inducer Slant at Brief Stimulus Presentations.
    Harada S, Mitsudo H.
    Perception; 2018 Feb; 47(2):171-184. PubMed ID: 29117775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Pictorial depth cues: a new slant.
    Zimmerman GL, Legge GE, Cavanagh P.
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1995 Jan; 12(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 7853087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Voluntarily controlled bi-stable slant perception of real and photographed surfaces.
    van Ee R, Krumina G, Pont S, van der Ven S.
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Jan 22; 272(1559):141-8. PubMed ID: 15695204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Motion and texture shape cues modulate perceived material properties.
    Marlow PJ, Anderson BL.
    J Vis; 2016 Jan 22; 16(1):5. PubMed ID: 26756175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Both parallelism and orthogonality are used to perceive 3D slant of rectangles from 2D images.
    Saunders JA, Backus BT.
    J Vis; 2007 Apr 13; 7(6):7. PubMed ID: 17685790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Orientation disparity: a cue for 3D orientation?
    Greenwald HS, Knill DC.
    Neural Comput; 2009 Sep 13; 21(9):2581-604. PubMed ID: 19548796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. The effect of illuminant position on perceived curvature.
    Curran W, Johnston A.
    Vision Res; 1996 May 13; 36(10):1399-410. PubMed ID: 8762759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Bi-stability in perceived slant when binocular disparity and monocular perspective specify different slants.
    van Ee R, van Dam LC, Erkelens CJ.
    J Vis; 2002 May 13; 2(9):597-607. PubMed ID: 12678631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. An analysis of binocular slant contrast.
    van Ee R, Banks MS, Backus BT.
    Perception; 1999 May 13; 28(9):1121-45. PubMed ID: 10694962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.