These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

194 related items for PubMed ID: 32722931

  • 1. Comparison between Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer: Performance and usability of the Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer in healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous patients.
    Morbio R, Longo C, De Vitto AML, Comacchio F, Della Porta LB, Marchini G.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 31(4):1850-1856. PubMed ID: 32722931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of Compass and Humphrey perimeters in detecting glaucomatous defects.
    Fogagnolo P, Modarelli A, Oddone F, Digiuni M, Montesano G, Orzalesi N, Rossetti L.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov 04; 26(6):598-606. PubMed ID: 27375066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study.
    Ahmed Y, Pereira A, Bowden S, Shi RB, Li Y, Ahmed IIK, Arshinoff SA.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022 Nov 04; 5(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 34358734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessing Precision of Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson Criteria for Staging Early Glaucomatous Damage in an Ocular Hypertension Cohort: A Retrospective Study.
    Chakravarti T.
    Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2017 Nov 04; 6(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 28161915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparing a head-mounted virtual reality perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer for visual field testing in healthy and glaucoma patients.
    Phu J, Wang H, Kalloniatis M.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jan 04; 44(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 37803502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma.
    Rao HL, Raveendran S, James V, Dasari S, Palakurthy M, Reddy HB, Pradhan ZS, Rao DA, Puttaiah NK, Devi S.
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar 04; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Prospective randomized comparative study of frequency doubling perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma].
    Kampmeier J, Eisert B, Buchwald HJ, Lang GK, Lang GE.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Mar 04; 218(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 11322052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Correlation between high-pass resolution perimetry and standard threshold perimetry in subjects with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Iester M, Capris P, Altieri M, Zingirian M, Traverso CE.
    Int Ophthalmol; 1999 Mar 04; 23(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 11196128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Montesano G, Bryan SR, Crabb DP, Fogagnolo P, Oddone F, McKendrick AM, Turpin A, Lanzetta P, Perdicchi A, Johnson CA, Garway-Heath DF, Brusini P, Rossetti LM.
    Ophthalmology; 2019 Feb 04; 126(2):242-251. PubMed ID: 30114416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Increased Depth, Reduced Extent, and Sharpened Edges of Visual Field Defects Measured by Compass Fundus Perimeter Compared to Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Liu P, Nguyen BN, Turpin A, McKendrick AM.
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Oct 04; 10(12):33. PubMed ID: 34694332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Kang J, De Arrigunaga S, Freeman SE, Zhao Y, Lin M, Liebman DL, Roldan AM, Kim JA, Chang DS, Friedman DS, Elze T.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023 Oct 04; 6(5):509-520. PubMed ID: 36918066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.
    Newkirk MR, Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Johnson CA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct 04; 47(10):4632-7. PubMed ID: 17003461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Perimetric Comparison Between the IMOvifa and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Nishida T, Eslani M, Weinreb RN, Arias J, Vasile C, Mohammadzadeh V, Moghimi S.
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Feb 01; 32(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 36223309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Bengtsson B.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec 01; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect by nonconventional perimetry.
    Iester M, Altieri M, Vittone P, Calabria G, Zingirian M, Traverso CE.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan 01; 135(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 12504694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test.
    Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Parisi L.
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Apr 01; 15(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 16633218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Advanced Vision Analyzer-Virtual Reality Perimeter: Device Validation, Functional Correlation and Comparison with Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Narang P, Agarwal A, Srinivasan M, Agarwal A.
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2021 Jun 01; 1(2):100035. PubMed ID: 36249304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Validation of a Head-mounted Virtual Reality Visual Field Screening Device.
    Mees L, Upadhyaya S, Kumar P, Kotawala S, Haran S, Rajasekar S, Friedman DS, Venkatesh R.
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Feb 01; 29(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 31790067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May 01; 111(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 8489447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression.
    Wall M, Johnson CA, Zamba KD.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct 01; 102(10):1396-1401. PubMed ID: 29331951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.