These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

277 related items for PubMed ID: 32727615

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
    Hartmann F, Dietz SO, Kuhn S, Hely H, Rommens PM, Gercek E.
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
    Schmidt S, Franke J, Rauschmann M, Adelt D, Bonsanto MM, Sola S.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of different interspinous process devices in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a finite element analysis.
    Liu Z, Zhang S, Li J, Tang H.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jun 17; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 35715775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Three-Year Follow-up of the Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Coflex Interlaminar Stabilization vs Instrumented Fusion in Patients With Lumbar Stenosis.
    Bae HW, Davis RJ, Lauryssen C, Leary S, Maislin G, Musacchio MJ.
    Neurosurgery; 2016 Aug 17; 79(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 27050538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Biomechanical effect of bone resorption of the spinous process after single-segment interspinous dynamic stabilization device implantation: A finite element analysis.
    Zhu ZQ, Duan S, Wang KF, Liu HY, Xu S, Liu CJ.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul 17; 97(27):e11140. PubMed ID: 29979380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biomechanical feasibility of semi-rigid stabilization and semi-rigid lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
    Wong CE, Hu HT, Kao LH, Liu CJ, Chen KC, Huang KY.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan 03; 23(1):10. PubMed ID: 34980068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Application of an interspinous process device after minimally invasive lumbar decompression could lead to stress redistribution at the pars interarticularis: a finite element analysis.
    Lo HJ, Chen CS, Chen HM, Yang SW.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May 15; 20(1):213. PubMed ID: 31092237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Biomechanical Analysis of Different Lumbar Interspinous Process Devices: A Finite Element Study.
    Shen H, Fogel GR, Zhu J, Liao Z, Liu W.
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul 15; 127():e1112-e1119. PubMed ID: 30980982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
    Cakir B, Carazzo C, Schmidt R, Mattes T, Reichel H, Käfer W.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May 20; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Paradoxical Radiographic Changes of Coflex Interspinous Device with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Lee N, Shin DA, Kim KN, Yoon DH, Ha Y, Shin HC, Yi S.
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan 20; 85():177-84. PubMed ID: 26361324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA, Doulgeris JJ, Aghayev K, Lee WE, Volkov A, Vrionis FD.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb 20; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Biomechanics and Mechanism of Action of Indirect Lumbar Decompression and the Evolution of a Stand-alone Spinous Process Spacer.
    Falowski SM, Sayed D, Deer TR, Brescacin D, Liang K.
    Pain Med; 2019 Dec 01; 20(Suppl 2):S14-S22. PubMed ID: 31808533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Biomechanical analysis of a newly developed interspinous process device conjunction with interbody cage based on a finite element model.
    Bae IS, Bak KH, Chun HJ, Ryu JI, Park SJ, Lee SJ.
    PLoS One; 2020 Dec 01; 15(12):e0243771. PubMed ID: 33306706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
    Lee CH, Kim YE, Lee HJ, Kim DG, Kim CH.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec 01; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.