These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

122 related items for PubMed ID: 32736202

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W.
    Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B, Büchner A, Nogueira W.
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cochlear Implant Stimulation of a Hearing Ear Generates Separate Electrophonic and Electroneural Responses.
    Sato M, Baumhoff P, Kral A.
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jan 06; 36(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 26740649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Ipsilateral masking between acoustic and electric stimulations.
    Lin P, Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Djalilian HR, Zeng FG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug 06; 130(2):858-65. PubMed ID: 21877801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Interaction Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Influences Speech Perception in Ipsilateral EAS Users.
    Imsiecke M, Krüger B, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Aug 06; 41(4):868-882. PubMed ID: 31592902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.
    Tejani VD, Brown CJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May 06; 147(5):3667. PubMed ID: 32486815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA, Koka K, Litvak LM, Finley CC.
    Ear Hear; 2018 May 06; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U, Rader T, Helbig S, Bahmer A.
    Ear Hear; 2011 May 06; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Goldsworthy RL, Delhorne LA, Braida LD, Reed CM.
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar 06; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T, Fastl H, Baumann U.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Mar 06; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Canfarotta MW, Dillon MT, Buss E, Pillsbury HC, Brown KD, O'Connell BP.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Mar 06; 41(5):1349-1361. PubMed ID: 32205726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A Computational Model of a Single Auditory Nerve Fiber for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Kipping D, Nogueira W.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Dec 06; 23(6):835-858. PubMed ID: 36333573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Amplitude Growth Functions of Auditory Nerve Responses to Electric Pulse Stimulation With Varied Interphase Gaps in Cochlear Implant Users With Ipsilateral Residual Hearing.
    Imsiecke M, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W.
    Trends Hear; 2021 Dec 06; 25():23312165211014137. PubMed ID: 34181493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.