These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

381 related items for PubMed ID: 32798831

  • 1. Cochlear implantation outcomes with round window electrode insertion versus cochleostomy insertion.
    Elafandi H, Khalifa MA, Elguindy AS.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Nov; 138():110272. PubMed ID: 32798831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of cochlear implant performance after round window electrode insertion compared with traditional cochleostomy.
    Kang BJ, Kim AH.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 May; 148(5):822-6. PubMed ID: 23447485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparable Electrode Impedance and Speech Perception at 12 Months after Cochlear Implantation Using Round Window versus Cochleostomy: An Analysis of 40 Patients.
    Cheng X, Wang B, Liu Y, Yuan Y, Shu Y, Chen B.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2018 May; 80(5-6):248-258. PubMed ID: 30121670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
    Hassepass F, Aschendorff A, Bulla S, Arndt S, Maier W, Laszig R, Beck R.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Spectral resolution and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the round window versus cochleostomy technique.
    Demir B, Yüksel M, Atılgan A, Ciprut A, Batman C.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2021 Jun; 135(6):513-517. PubMed ID: 33958008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Does pediatric cochlear implant insertion technique affect intraoperative neural response telemetry thresholds?
    Poley M, Overmyer E, Craun P, Holcomb M, Reilly B, White D, Preciado D.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1404-7. PubMed ID: 26166451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
    Rowe D, Chambers S, Hampson A, Eastwood H, Campbell L, O'Leary S.
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Deep round window insertion versus standard approach in cochlear implant surgery.
    Nordfalk KF, Rasmussen K, Bunne M, Jablonski GE.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jan; 273(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 25549811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A modified form of the St Thomas' Hospital (STH) classification to improve cochlear implantation outcomes.
    Elafandi H, Khalifa MA, Elnaggar A, Gamea M, Ebeid K, Tomoum MO.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jan; 164():111375. PubMed ID: 36401999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Communication outcomes for groups of children using cochlear implants enrolled in auditory-verbal, aural-oral, and bilingual-bicultural early intervention programs.
    Dettman S, Wall E, Constantinescu G, Dowell R.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):451-9. PubMed ID: 23442569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of depth of electrode insertion between cochleostomy and round window approach: a cadaveric study.
    Jangra A, Das KN, Sharma V, Timmaraju S, Khera P, Tiwari S, Soni K, Choudhury B, Ghatak S, Dixit SG, Nayyar AK, Goyal A.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3547-3555. PubMed ID: 38294508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cochlear implantation and hearing preservation: Results in 21 consecutively operated patients using the round window approach.
    Erixon E, Köbler S, Rask-Andersen H.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 22667762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Does cochleostomy location influence electrode trajectory and intracochlear trauma?
    Zhou L, Friedmann DR, Treaba C, Peng R, Roland JT.
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Apr; 125(4):966-71. PubMed ID: 25345671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Intraoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds in children undergone cochlear implantation: round window and cochleostomy approaches.
    Karatas E, Aud MD, Baglam T, Durucu C, Baysal E, Kanlikama M.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1123-6. PubMed ID: 21737149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.
    Blamey PJ, Sarant JZ, Paatsch LE, Barry JG, Bow CP, Wales RJ, Wright M, Psarros C, Rattigan K, Tooher R.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):264-85. PubMed ID: 11324650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Functional Outcomes in Cochleostomy and Round Window Insertion Technique: Difference or No Difference?
    Rajput M, Nilakantan A.
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 71(Suppl 2):1615-1620. PubMed ID: 31750226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Impact of socioeconomic factors on paediatric cochlear implant outcomes.
    Sharma S, Bhatia K, Singh S, Lahiri AK, Aggarwal A.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():90-97. PubMed ID: 29106884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of electrode position between round window and cochleostomy inserting approaches among young children: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Fan X, Xia M, Wang Z, Zhang H, Liu C, Wang N, Hou L, Li C, Xu A.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Sep; 138(9):815-821. PubMed ID: 29936898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants in children: a study of spoken language outcomes.
    Sarant J, Harris D, Bennet L, Bant S.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Sep; 35(4):396-409. PubMed ID: 24557003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.