These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
139 related items for PubMed ID: 3280064
1. Iotrolan versus iopamidol for radiculography: a randomized double-blind study. Coutinho C, McGeorge A, Macpherson P, Teasdale E. Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):89-90. PubMed ID: 3280064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Iotrolan versus iopamidol. A controlled double-blind study with lumbar myelography]. Maier B, Gerber U, König M, Stetter G. Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8):393-6. PubMed ID: 1410326 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography. A double blind clinical trial comparing a non-ionic (iohexol) and an ionic (metrizoate) contrast medium. Skalpe IO, Ostensen HM. Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 6373261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative trial of sodium meglumine ioxaglate (Hexabrix) and iopamidol (Niopam) for cerebral angiography. Molyneux AJ, Sheldon PW, Yates DA. Br J Radiol; 1982 Dec; 55(660):881-4. PubMed ID: 6756533 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A double-blind study comparing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ioversol 320 and iopamidol-300 in cerebral angiography. Ringel K, Kuehn J. Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S48-51. PubMed ID: 2687196 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural tolerance of iotrolan 300 in ascending cervical myelography: results of a multicenter study. Behrends B, Albrecht A, Bingas B, Becker H, Brunke J, von Einsiedel H, Mariss G, Schmidt K, Thun F, Valavanis A. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Jun; 128():171-5. PubMed ID: 2568789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Use of iopamidol in selective coronarography: a comparative study in relation to ioxaglate]. Thévenin P, Amiel M. Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):769-73. PubMed ID: 6367616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [A randomized, double-blind clinical trial of 2 nonionic contrast media for myelography]. Lovrencić M, Klanfar Z, Jakovac I. Lijec Vjesn; 1986 Apr; 108(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 3520199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Urography with monomeric and dimeric nonionic contrast media: comparative, randomized, double-blind study of iotrolan 280 and iopromide 300. Taenzer V, Wenzel-Hora BI. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Apr; 128():116-8. PubMed ID: 2568778 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Arthrography with iotrolan: double-blind comparison between nonionic, monomeric (iohexol 300) and nonionic, dimeric (iotrolan 300) contrast media. Schmidt M, Papassotiriou V. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Apr; 128():182-9. PubMed ID: 2568791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Initial experience with a nonionic, dimeric contrast medium (iotrolan) in direct and indirect arteriography: a randomized, intraindividual double-blind study in 60 patients. Hagen B, Wenzel-Hora BI. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Apr; 128():54-60. PubMed ID: 2568808 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]