These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
163 related items for PubMed ID: 32826142
1. The Effect of Femoral Head Size, Neck Length, and Offset on Dislocation Rates of Constrained Acetabular Liners. Warschawski Y, Garceau SP, Joly DA, Kuzyk P, Gross A, Safir O. J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):345-348. PubMed ID: 32826142 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners. Hoskins W, Griffin X, Hatton A, de Steiger RN, Bingham R. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan 01; 479(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 32876424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What is the failure rate of constrained liners in complex revision total hip arthroplasty? Unter Ecker N, Piakong P, Delgado G, Gehrke T, Citak M, Ohlmeier M. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Mar 01; 143(3):1671-1678. PubMed ID: 35377048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: when to select dual mobility, large heads, constrained liners, or a standard head size? Testing one hundred thousand hip revisions with artificial intelligence. Hernigou P, Tannyeres P, Barbier O, Chenaie P. Int Orthop; 2023 Aug 01; 47(8):2003-2011. PubMed ID: 37326696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Can Dislocation of a Constrained Liner Be Salvaged With Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA? Chalmers BP, Pallante GD, Taunton MJ, Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb 01; 476(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 29529660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners? Cafri G, Paxton EW, Love R, Bini SA, Kurtz SM. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 May 01; 475(5):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 27385222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Have large femoral heads reduced prosthetic impingement in total hip arthroplasty? Waddell BS, Koch C, Trivellas M, Burket JC, Wright T, Padgett D. Hip Int; 2019 Jan 01; 29(1):83-88. PubMed ID: 29734855 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual-mobility bearings reduce instability but may not be the only answer in revision total hip arthroplasty for recurrent dislocation. Scholz J, Perka C, Hipfl C. Bone Joint J; 2024 May 01; 106-B(5 Supple B):89-97. PubMed ID: 38688508 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The focally constrained liner is a reasonable option for revision of unstable total hip arthroplasty. Mäkinen TJ, Fichman SG, Rahman WA, Amenabar T, Safir O, Gross AE, Kuzyk PR. Int Orthop; 2016 Nov 01; 40(11):2239-2245. PubMed ID: 26695773 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. No Difference in Dislocation Rates Comparing Large Diameter Jumbo Femoral Heads and Dual-Mobility Bearings in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Sonn KA, Deckard ER, Meneghini RM. J Arthroplasty; 2021 Nov 01; 36(11):3716-3721. PubMed ID: 34391597 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads. Hartzler MA, Abdel MP, Sculco PK, Taunton MJ, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb 01; 476(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 29529658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Large Femoral Heads and Select Dual-Mobility Bearings Are Associated With Reduced Instability in Contemporary Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. Pitz-Gonçalves LI, Deckard ER, Meneghini RM. J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul 01; 38(7S):S124-S130. PubMed ID: 36791889 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]