These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


156 related items for PubMed ID: 32826511

  • 1. Association Between Nonoptimal Blood Pressure and Cochlear Function.
    Baiduc RR, Ramsey M, Sanders A, Vance EA.
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):393-404. PubMed ID: 32826511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM, Phillips DS, Fausti SA, Gordon JS, Helt WJ, Wilmington D, Bratt GW, Konrad-Martin D.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Test-retest reliability of distortion-product thresholds compared to behavioral auditory thresholds.
    Bader K, Dierkes L, Braun LH, Gummer AW, Dalhoff E, Zelle D.
    Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108232. PubMed ID: 33984603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS, Prieve BA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications.
    Wagner W, Plinkert PK, Vonthein R, Plontke SK.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 265(10):1165-72. PubMed ID: 18301908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.
    Rogers AR, Burke SR, Kopun JG, Tan H, Neely ST, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 20458245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE, Long KM, Lees SE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in middle-aged subjects with normal versus potentially presbyacusic high-frequency hearing loss.
    Nieschalk M, Hustert B, Stoll W.
    Audiology; 1998 Oct; 37(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 9547922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Otoacoustic emissions measurements in children during the chemotherapy because of the acute lymphoblastic leukemia].
    Lisowska G, Namysłowski G, Hajduk A, Polok A, Tomaszewska R, Misiołek M.
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2006 Oct; 60(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 16989457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Changes in the Compressive Nonlinearity of the Cochlea During Early Aging: Estimates From Distortion OAE Input/Output Functions.
    Ortmann AJ, Abdala C.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Oct; 37(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 27232070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. High-Frequency Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Repeatability in a Patient Population.
    Dreisbach L, Zettner E, Chang Liu M, Meuel Fernhoff C, MacPhee I, Boothroyd A.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Oct; 39(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 28678077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA, Baranowski LG.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Oct; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M, Mom T, Guitton M, Poncet JL, Bonfils P, Avan P.
    Audiology; 2001 Oct; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards.
    Gorga MP, Neely ST, Dorn PA.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):345-62. PubMed ID: 10466570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for the assessment of auditory sensitivity].
    Chida E.
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1998 Nov; 101(11):1335-47. PubMed ID: 9867000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM, Feeney MP, Gates GA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Estimation of Minor Conductive Hearing Loss in Humans Using Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Marcrum SC, Kummer P, Steffens T.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Dec; 38(4):391-398. PubMed ID: 28169838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.