These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
125 related items for PubMed ID: 32839559
21. Glaucoma referral refinement in Ireland: managing the sensitivity-specificity paradox in optometric practice. Barrett C, O'Brien C, Loughman J. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Jul; 38(4):400-410. PubMed ID: 29492992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Does optometrists' self-reported practice in glaucoma detection predict actual practice as determined by standardised patients? Theodossiades J, Myint J, Murdoch IE, Edgar DF, Lawrenson JG. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 May; 32(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 22329780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of changes in referral behaviour following NICE guideline publication on agreement of examination findings between professionals in an established glaucoma referral refinement pathway: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways project. Ratnarajan G, Newsom W, French K, Kean J, Chang L, Parker M, Garway-Heath DF, Bourne RR. Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 97(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 23111242 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The Carmarthenshire Glaucoma Referral Refinement Scheme, a safe and efficient screening service. Devarajan N, Williams GS, Hopes M, O'Sullivan D, Jones D. Eye (Lond); 2011 Jan; 25(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 20966973 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Cambridge community Optometry Glaucoma Scheme. Keenan J, Shahid H, Bourne RR, White AJ, Martin KR. Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 43(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 25070417 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of optometrist glaucoma referrals against published guidelines. Khan S, Clarke J, Kotecha A. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 23009293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. An analysis of glaucoma repeat measures assessment results: Are core competencies enough? Karas M, Bartlett S, Whitaker A, Sheen N, North R, Ryan B. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Nov; 42(6):1147-1158. PubMed ID: 35988019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Can a community optometrist-based referral refinement scheme reduce false-positive glaucoma hospital referrals without compromising quality of care? The community and hospital allied network glaucoma evaluation scheme (CHANGES). Bourne RR, French KA, Chang L, Borman AD, Hingorani M, Newsom WD. Eye (Lond); 2010 May; 24(5):881-7. PubMed ID: 19648892 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A review of professional liability claims in optometry. Scholles JR. J Am Optom Assoc; 1986 Oct; 57(10):764-6. PubMed ID: 3771996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The false negative rate and the role for virtual review in a nationally evaluated glaucoma referral refinement scheme. Ratnarajan G, Kean J, French K, Parker M, Bourne R. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 26088949 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Use of visual field tests in glaucoma detection by optometrists in England and Wales. Tuck MW, Crick RP. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1994 Jul; 14(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 7970736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]