These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

154 related items for PubMed ID: 32889846

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparing leak pressure of LMA® ProSeal™ versus i-gel® at head rotation: a randomized controlled trial.
    Chaki T, Koizumi M, Tachibana S, Matsumoto T, Kumagai T, Hashimoto Y, Yamakage M.
    Can J Anaesth; 2024 Jan; 71(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 38017196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Randomized prospective trial comparing two supraglottic airway devices: i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in paralyzed patients.
    Joly N, Poulin LP, Tanoubi I, Drolet P, Donati F, St-Pierre P.
    Can J Anaesth; 2014 Sep; 61(9):794-800. PubMed ID: 25141831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. LMA Supreme™ vs i-gel™--a comparison of insertion success in novices.
    Ragazzi R, Finessi L, Farinelli I, Alvisi R, Volta CA.
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 22329593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II™ size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children.
    Gasteiger L, Ofner S, Stögermüller B, Ziegler B, Brimacombe J, Keller C.
    Anaesthesist; 2016 Aug; 65(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 27380049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A randomized comparison of the Ambu AuraGain versus the LMA supreme in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery.
    Lopez AM, Agusti M, Gambus P, Pons M, Anglada T, Valero R.
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 27889843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
    Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, Yousaf F, Wong J, Wong DT, Chung F.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of I-gel™ airway in different head and neck positions in anesthetized paralyzed children.
    Jain D, Ghai B, Bala I, Gandhi K, Banerjee G.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Dec; 25(12):1248-53. PubMed ID: 26383088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of changing the sequence of cuff inflation and device fixation with the LMA-Supreme® on device position, ventilatory complications, and airway morbidity: a clinical and fiberscopic study.
    Bergmann I, Crozier TA, Roessler M, Schotola H, Mansur A, Büttner B, Hinz JM, Bauer M.
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2014 Jan 04; 14():2. PubMed ID: 24387685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Ambu® AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ Second Seal™: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients.
    Shariffuddin II, Teoh WH, Tang E, Hashim N, Loh PS.
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2017 Mar 04; 45(2):244-250. PubMed ID: 28267947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.