These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
373 related items for PubMed ID: 32898047
1. What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years? Verspeek J, Nijenhuis TA, Kuijpers MFL, Rijnen WHC, Schreurs BW. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan 01; 479(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 32898047 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients. Te Stroet MA, Rijnen WH, Gardeniers JW, van Kampen A, Schreurs BW. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec 01; 473(12):3867-75. PubMed ID: 25894808 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years. Colo E, Rijnen WH, Gardeniers JW, van Kampen A, Schreurs BW. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov 01; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement. Maruyama M, Wakabayashi S, Ota H, Tensho K. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb 01; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects. García-Rey E, Madero R, García-Cimbrelo E. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec 01; 473(12):3882-91. PubMed ID: 26245166 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component? Gromov K, Pedersen AB, Overgaard S, Gebuhr P, Malchau H, Troelsen A. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov 01; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Rastogi D. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep 01; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years and the outcome of subsequent revisions. Schmitz MW, Busch VJ, Gardeniers JW, Hendriks JC, Veth RP, Schreurs BW. BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Jan 22; 14():37. PubMed ID: 23339294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty. Berger RA, Quigley LR, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec 22; 81(12):1682-91. PubMed ID: 10608379 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and cemented polyethylene socket in total hip revision arthroplasty. Kostensalo I, Seppänen M, Virolainen P, Mokka J, Koivisto M, Mäkelä KT. Scand J Surg; 2015 Dec 22; 104(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 25681057 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Does a titanium-coated polyethylene press-fit cup give reliable midterm results? Hooper N, Sargeant H, Frampton C, Hooper G. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec 22; 473(12):3806-10. PubMed ID: 26373851 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]