These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

134 related items for PubMed ID: 32902210

  • 1. Comparison of Application Biological Variation and Patient Data for Selecting Delta Check Limits.
    Huang Y, Song L, Li Y, Dai W, Zhang PA.
    Clin Lab; 2020 Sep 01; 66(9):. PubMed ID: 32902210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Usefulness of biological variation in the establishment of delta check limits.
    Lee J, Kim SY, Kwon HJ, Lee HK, Kim Y, Kim Y.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2016 Dec 01; 463():18-21. PubMed ID: 27524506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. New decision criteria for selecting delta check methods based on the ratio of the delta difference to the width of the reference range can be generally applicable for each clinical chemistry test item.
    Park SH, Kim SY, Lee W, Chun S, Min WK.
    Ann Lab Med; 2012 Sep 01; 32(5):345-54. PubMed ID: 22950070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The use of reference change values in clinical laboratories.
    Bugdayci G, Oguzman H, Arattan HY, Sasmaz G.
    Clin Lab; 2015 Sep 01; 61(3-4):251-7. PubMed ID: 25974990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Differential application of rate and delta check on selected clinical chemistry tests.
    Kim JW, Kim JQ, Kim SI.
    J Korean Med Sci; 1990 Dec 01; 5(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 2100125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Delta Check Practices and Outcomes: A Q-Probes Study Involving 49 Health Care Facilities and 6541 Delta Check Alerts.
    Schifman RB, Talbert M, Souers RJ.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Jun 01; 141(6):813-823. PubMed ID: 28402169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Interpreting changes in consecutive laboratory results: clinician's perspectives on clinically significant change.
    Kim SK, Chung JW, Lim J, Jeong TD, Chang J, Seo M, Lim HS, Kim S.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2023 Aug 01; 548():117462. PubMed ID: 37390943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Transformation of Sequential Hospital and Outpatient Laboratory Data into Between-Day Reference Change Values.
    Cembrowski GS, Lyon AW, McCudden C, Qiu Y, Xu Q, Mei J, Tran DV, Sadrzadeh SMH, Cervinski MA.
    Clin Chem; 2022 Mar 31; 68(4):595-603. PubMed ID: 35137000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Selection of Single-Analyte Delta Check Rules with Logistic Regression for Detection of Intravenous Fluid Contamination in a Clinical Chemistry Laboratory.
    Yang J, Wen S, McCudden CR, Tacker DH.
    J Appl Lab Med; 2024 Sep 03; 9(5):1001-1013. PubMed ID: 38959067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evidence-based approach to setting delta check rules.
    Markus C, Tan RZ, Loh TP.
    Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 2021 Jan 03; 58(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 32795201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Simulations of delta check rule performance to detect specimen mislabeling using historical laboratory data.
    Strathmann FG, Baird GS, Hoffman NG.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2011 Oct 09; 412(21-22):1973-7. PubMed ID: 21782806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.