These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
202 related items for PubMed ID: 32903129
1. Development and validation of a digits-in-noise hearing test in Persian. Motlagh Zadeh L, Silbert NH, Sternasty K, Moore DR. Int J Audiol; 2021 Mar; 60(3):202-209. PubMed ID: 32903129 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners. Smits C, Watson CS, Kidd GR, Moore DR, Goverts ST. Int J Audiol; 2016 Mar; 55(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 26940045 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and validation of a smartphone-based digits-in-noise hearing test in South African English. Potgieter JM, Swanepoel de W, Myburgh HC, Hopper TC, Smits C. Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 27121117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech Recognition in Noise Using Binaural Diotic and Antiphasic Digits-in-Noise in Children: Maturation and Self-Test Validity. Wolmarans J, De Sousa KC, Frisby C, Mahomed-Asmail F, Smits C, Moore DR, Swanepoel W. J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 May; 32(5):315-323. PubMed ID: 34375996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved Sensitivity of Digits-in-Noise Test to High-Frequency Hearing Loss. Motlagh Zadeh L, Silbert NH, Swanepoel W, Moore DR. Ear Hear; 2021 May; 42(3):565-573. PubMed ID: 33928924 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the Efficiency of the Digits-in-Noise Hearing Screening Test: A Comparison Between Four Different Test Procedures. Dambha T, Swanepoel W, Mahomed-Asmail F, De Sousa KC, Graham MA, Smits C. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan 12; 65(1):378-391. PubMed ID: 34890245 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Digits in noise testing in a multilingual sample of Asian adults. Chee J, Eikelboom RH, Smits C, Swanepoel W, Wee SL, Ng TP, Heywood RL. Int J Audiol; 2024 Apr 12; 63(4):269-274. PubMed ID: 36847757 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test. Warzybok A, Zokoll M, Wardenga N, Ozimek E, Boboshko M, Kollmeier B. Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr 12; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech Recognition Abilities in Normal-Hearing Children 4 to 12 Years of Age in Stationary and Interrupted Noise. Koopmans WJA, Goverts ST, Smits C. Ear Hear; 2018 Apr 12; 39(6):1091-1103. PubMed ID: 29554035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Remote self-report and speech-in-noise measures predict clinical audiometric thresholds. Zadeh LM, Brennan V, Swanepoel W, Lin L, Moore DR. medRxiv; 2023 Jul 17. PubMed ID: 35821983 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating a smartphone digits-in-noise test as part of the audiometric test battery. Potgieter JM, Swanepoel W, Smits C. S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 May 21; 65(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29781704 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The South African English Smartphone Digits-in-Noise Hearing Test: Effect of Age, Hearing Loss, and Speaking Competence. Potgieter JM, Swanepoel W, Myburgh HC, Smits C. Ear Hear; 2018 May 21; 39(4):656-663. PubMed ID: 29189432 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]