These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


183 related items for PubMed ID: 32910685

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
    Youk JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ, Kim JA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
    Youk JH, Kim SJ, Son EJ, Gweon HM, Kim JA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of variability in breast density assessment by BI-RADS category according to the level of experience.
    Eom HJ, Cha JH, Kang JW, Choi WJ, Kim HJ, Go E.
    Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):527-532. PubMed ID: 28766978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting.
    van der Waal D, den Heeten GJ, Pijnappel RM, Schuur KH, Timmers JM, Verbeek AL, Broeders MJ.
    PLoS One; 2015 May; 10(9):e0136667. PubMed ID: 26335569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment.
    Gweon HM, Youk JH, Kim JA, Son EJ.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 23971465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
    Sartor H, Lång K, Rosso A, Borgquist S, Zackrisson S, Timberg P.
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Mammographic density assessment: comparison of radiologists, automated volumetric measurement, and artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis.
    Eom HJ, Cha JH, Choi WJ, Cho SM, Jin K, Kim HH.
    Acta Radiol; 2024 Jul; 65(7):708-715. PubMed ID: 38825883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation.
    Østerås BH, Martinsen AC, Brandal SH, Chaudhry KN, Eben E, Haakenaasen U, Falk RS, Skaane P.
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1178-85. PubMed ID: 26792823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
    Jeffers AM, Sieh W, Lipson JA, Rothstein JH, McGuire V, Whittemore AS, Rubin DL.
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
    Brandt KR, Scott CG, Ma L, Mahmoudzadeh AP, Jensen MR, Whaley DH, Wu FF, Malkov S, Hruska CB, Norman AD, Heine J, Shepherd J, Pankratz VS, Kerlikowske K, Vachon CM.
    Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of Qualitative and Volumetric Assessments of Breast Density and Analyses of Breast Compression Parameters and Breast Volume of Women in Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project.
    Gemici AA, Arıbal E, Özaydın AN, Gürdal SÖ, Özçınar B, Cabioğlu N, Özmen V.
    Eur J Breast Health; 2020 Apr; 16(2):110-116. PubMed ID: 32285032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations.
    Balleyguier C, Arfi-Rouche J, Boyer B, Gauthier E, Helin V, Loshkajian A, Ragusa S, Delaloge S.
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3830-3838. PubMed ID: 30770972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.