These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
141 related items for PubMed ID: 32920828
1. Correlation of the lumbar dural sac dimension with the spread of spinal anesthesia in elderly female patients: A prospective observational study. Chang JE, Kim H, Oh Y, Hwang JY. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2021 Jan; 65(1):116-122. PubMed ID: 32920828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in lumbar dural sac dimension in supine and lateral positions in late pregnancy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Xu F, Liu Y, Wei Y, Zhao Y, Yuan H, Guo X. Int J Obstet Anesth; 2016 May; 26():19-23. PubMed ID: 26597406 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of rigid vs. dynamic instrumentation for stabilization of the degenerative lumbosacral spine. Korovessis P, Papazisis Z, Lambiris E. Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002 May; 91():457-61. PubMed ID: 15457776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography? Kanno H, Endo T, Ozawa H, Koizumi Y, Morozumi N, Itoi E, Ishii Y. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul 15; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of lumbar canal stenosis: decubitus imaging methods versus flexion-extension myelography and surface measurements versus the diameter of the dural sac]. Coulier B. JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr 15; 83(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 10859898 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital computed tomography evaluation of spinal canal and dural sac before and after surgical decompression of lumbar stenosis. Rapała K, Chaberek S, Truszczyńska A, Łukawski S, Walczak P. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2010 Apr 15; 12(2):120-35. PubMed ID: 20453251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Anatomical background of low back pain: variability and degeneration of the lumbar spinal canal and intervertebral disc]. van Roy P, Barbaix E, Clarijs JP, Mense S. Schmerz; 2001 Dec 15; 15(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 11793145 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Regional bone mineral density differences measured by quantitative computed tomography: does the standard clinically used L1-L2 average correlate with the entire lumbosacral spine? Salzmann SN, Shirahata T, Yang J, Miller CO, Carlson BB, Rentenberger C, Carrino JA, Shue J, Sama AA, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Hughes AP. Spine J; 2019 Apr 15; 19(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 30343044 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomical Study of the Lumbar Segmental Arteries in Relation to the Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Approach. Wu T, Xiao L, Liu C, Tao X, Xu H. World Neurosurg; 2020 Jun 15; 138():e778-e786. PubMed ID: 32217175 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic changes in the dural sac of patients with lumbar canal stenosis evaluated by multidetector-row computed tomography after myelography. Kanbara S, Yukawa Y, Ito K, Machino M, Kato F. Eur Spine J; 2014 Jan 15; 23(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 23817960 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]