These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
200 related items for PubMed ID: 32934986
1. Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery. Phyo HE, Chaiyasamut T, Kiattavorncharoen S, Pairuchvej V, Bhattarai BP, Wongsirichat N. J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2020 Aug; 20(4):203-212. PubMed ID: 32934986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lignocaine in achieving palatal anesthesia following a single buccal infiltration during periodontal therapy: A randomized double-blind split-mouth study. Ashwath B, Subramoniam S, Vijayalakshmi R, Shanmugam M, Priya BM, Anitha V. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Aug; 34(1):107-110. PubMed ID: 29643633 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine Single Buccal Infiltration versus Conventional Buccal and Palatal Injection Using Lidocaine during Primary Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized Control Trial. Kolli NK, Nirmala SV, Nuvvula S. Anesth Essays Res; 2017 Aug; 11(1):160-164. PubMed ID: 28298777 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Anesthetic Efficacy of Single Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine in Extraction of Maxillary 1st Molar. Kumar DP, Sharma M, Patil V, Subedar RS, Lakshmi GV, Manjunath NV. Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Aug; 9(2):239-246. PubMed ID: 31909001 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine with Buccal and Palatal Infiltration of 2% Lignocaine for the Extraction of Maxillary Premolar Teeth. Sandilya V, Andrade NN, Mathai PC, Aggarwal N, Sahu V, Nerurkar S. Contemp Clin Dent; 2019 Aug; 10(2):284-288. PubMed ID: 32308291 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pulpal anesthesia of maxillary first molars using 4% articaine infiltration in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Afkhami F, Rostami G, Peters OA, Kamalian F. Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3999-4006. PubMed ID: 37243822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Majid OW, Ahmed AM. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine infiltration versus 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of primary mandibular molars: A prospective, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial. Jain K, Katge F, Chimata VK, Patil D, Ghadge S, Bhanushali N. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2021 Apr; 39(4):409-415. PubMed ID: 35102967 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy of 4% Articaine, 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lignocaine using a Single Buccal Supraperiosteal Injection for Maxillary Tooth Extraction. Chandrasekaran D, Chinnaswami R, Shanthi K, Dhiravia Sargunam AE, Kumar KS, Satheesh T. J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S721-S724. PubMed ID: 34447189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of Articaine vs Lignocaine for infiltration anaesthesia during primary molar extractions. Chen S, Xiang J, Ji Y. Pak J Med Sci; 2022 Jun; 38(4Part-II):1048-1055. PubMed ID: 35634630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Extraction of permanent maxillary teeth by only buccal infiltration of articaine. Somuri AV, Rai AB, Pillai M. J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2013 Jun; 12(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 24431829 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lignocaine during the surgical removal of the third molar: A comparative prospective study. Jain NK, John RR. Anesth Essays Res; 2016 Jun; 10(2):356-61. PubMed ID: 27212774 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A Split-Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lignocaine for Maxillary Bicuspids Extraction. Jaiswal P, Goyal R, Dubey C, Akhter J, Ramalingam K, Kalita S. Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e40167. PubMed ID: 37431340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Efficacy Between Articaine and Lignocaine in Simultaneous Bilateral Orthodontic Maxillary Premolar Extractions: A Split-Mouth Comparative Study. Krishna S, Bhaskaran R, Kumar SP, Krishnan M. Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50078. PubMed ID: 38192927 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary posterior teeth removal without palatal injection -truth or myth: a dilemma for oral surgeons. Sharma K, Sharma A, Aseri M, Batta A, Singh V, Pilania D, Kumar Sharma Y. J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Nov; 8(11):ZC01-4. PubMed ID: 25584295 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the Pain Reaction of Children and Evaluation of Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration with Articaine and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block with Lignocaine for Pulp Therapy in Primary Mandibular Second Molars. Daneswari V, Venugopal Reddy N, Madhavi G, Pranathi P. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021 Nov; 14(3):335-339. PubMed ID: 34720502 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Buccal versus buccal palatal infiltration for pulpal anesthesia using 2% lidocaine and 4% articaine: A randomized controlled trial. Kumar U, Garg N, Vashisht R, Kumari A, Kaur CK, Rajput A. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2024 Nov; 14(2):205-210. PubMed ID: 38445050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]