These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
142 related items for PubMed ID: 3296077
1. [The diagnostic value of anti-DNA antibodies depends on the technic used for their detection]. Abuaf N, Lelong F, Johanet C, Goossens D, Aline E, Chotel M. Rev Med Interne; 1987; 8(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 3296077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical significance of anti-nDNA antibodies in ANA-positive systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison of the Farr radioimmunoassay and the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescent technique. Chuan MT, Wu YC, Ang ET, Wang JH, In KL, Lü YC. Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Ji Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1985 Feb; 18(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 3896689 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical significance of measuring different anti-dsDNA antibodies by using the Farr assay, an enzyme immunoassay and a Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test. Werle E, Blazek M, Fiehn W. Lupus; 1992 Dec; 1(6):369-77. PubMed ID: 1304405 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Crithidia luciliae and Farr assays for the detection of systemic lupus erythematosus. Burdash NM, Teti G, Papadopoulos V. Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1983 Dec; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 6340594 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of indirect immunofluorescence on Crithidia luciliae of Farr test, and immunoenzymatic methods for the screening of anti-native DNA autoantibodies]. Chrétien P, Dauvin M, Hélin P, Ocwieja T, Absalon YB, Johanet C. Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1994 Dec; 52(9):645-50. PubMed ID: 7872513 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Contribution of immunoenzymatic technics to the assay of anti-native DNA antibodies in the biological diagnosis of lupus erythematosus disseminatus]. Laplanche S, Diemert MC, Musset L, Abuaf N, Galli J. Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1990 Dec; 48(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 2191610 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of anti-DNA antibodies: a comparison between two Farr assays, Crithidia luciliae and a human chromosomal substrate assay. Tipping PG, Buchanan RR, Riglar AG, Dimech WJ, Littlejohn GO, Holdsworth SR. Br J Rheumatol; 1988 Jun; 27(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 3288291 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of anti-DNA antibodies by ELISA: a comparative study with Crithidia and a Farr assay. Tipping PG, Buchanan RC, Riglar AG, Dimech WJ, Littlejohn GO, Holdsworth SR. Pathology; 1991 Jan; 23(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2062564 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus: new-generation immunoassays for measurement of anti-dsDNA antibodies are an effective alternative to the Farr technique and the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test. Antico A, Platzgummer S, Bassetti D, Bizzaro N, Tozzoli R, Villalta D, Study Group on Autoimmune Diseases of the Italian Society of Laboratory Medicine (SIMeL). Lupus; 2010 Jul; 19(8):906-12. PubMed ID: 20179169 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Detection of anti-double stranded DNA antibodies of IgG, IgA and IgM classes by ELISA. Comparison with the Farr test and indirect immunofluorescence]. Preud'homme JL, Danon F, Rochard E, Gouet D, Touchard G, Aucouturier P, Alcalay M. Presse Med; 2010 Jul; 17(27):1401-4. PubMed ID: 2971167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Determination of anti dsDNA antibodies by immunofluorescence using Crithidia luciliae. I--Diagnostic and prognostic value in systemic lupus erythematosus. Comparison with the Farr radioimmunoassay]. Borda-Iriarte O, Meyer O, Cyna J, Haïm T, Ryckewaert A. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic; 1984 Apr; 51(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 6374861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Anti-DNA antibodies: the choice of assays for routine diagnostic work. Sarvas H, Gripenberg M, Leirisalo-Repo M. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand C; 1985 Feb; 93(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 3885680 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Anti-dsDNA antibodies and disease classification in antinuclear antibody positive patients: the role of analytical diversity. Haugbro K, Nossent JC, Winkler T, Figenschau Y, Rekvig OP. Ann Rheum Dis; 2004 Apr; 63(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 15020332 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Specificity of the hydrochloric-acid-modified Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence assay for detection of antibody to native DNA. Henderson T, Medsger TA, Sontheimer RD, Harmon CE, Deng JS. Diagn Clin Immunol; 1987 Apr; 5(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 3297382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of anti-ds-DNA antibodies by three different methods: comparison of sensitivity, specificity and correlation with lupus activity index (LAI). Tzioufas AG, Terzoglou C, Stavropoulos ED, Athanasiadou S, Moutsopoulos HM. Clin Rheumatol; 1990 Jun; 9(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 2202542 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of commercial kits for the detection of anti-nDNA antibodies using Crithidia luciliae. Jansen EM, Deng JS, Beutner EH, Kumar V, Chorzelski TP. Am J Clin Pathol; 1987 Apr; 87(4):461-9. PubMed ID: 3548319 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]