These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

388 related items for PubMed ID: 32976249

  • 1. Assessing the Quality of Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing: Implications for Combined Electroacoustic Stimulation With Cochlear Implants.
    Spitzer ER, Landsberger DM, Friedmann DR.
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):475-486. PubMed ID: 32976249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Behavioral characterization of the cochlear amplifier lesion due to loss of function of stereocilin (STRC) in human subjects.
    Benoit C, Carlson RJ, King MC, Horn DL, Rubinstein JT.
    Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 439():108898. PubMed ID: 37890241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Music Is More Enjoyable With Two Ears, Even If One of Them Receives a Degraded Signal Provided By a Cochlear Implant.
    Landsberger DM, Vermeire K, Stupak N, Lavender A, Neukam J, Van de Heyning P, Svirsky MA.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Nov; 41(3):476-490. PubMed ID: 31469701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T, Fastl H, Baumann U.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Nov; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY, Mullangi A, Marozeau J.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Nov; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
    Rader T, Adel Y, Fastl H, Baumann U.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jul; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.
    Tejani VD, Brown CJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3667. PubMed ID: 32486815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness.
    Ma N, Morris S, Kitterick PT.
    Ear Hear; 2016 May; 37(3):248-59. PubMed ID: 27116049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Neuman AC, Zeman A, Neukam J, Wang B, Svirsky MA.
    Ear Hear; 2019 May; 40(3):621-635. PubMed ID: 30067559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH, Stecker GC.
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
    Aronoff JM, Freed DJ, Fisher LM, Pal I, Soli SD.
    Ear Hear; 2011 May; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
    Krüger B, Büchner A, Nogueira W.
    Ear Hear; 2022 May; 43(2):631-645. PubMed ID: 34593687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    O'Neill ER, Parke MN, Kreft HA, Oxenham AJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1224. PubMed ID: 33639827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
    Arehart KH, Croghan NB, Muralimanohar RK.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Feb; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders.
    Wess JM, Brungart DS, Bernstein JGW.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Feb; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cochlear dead regions constrain the benefit of combining acoustic stimulation with electric stimulation.
    Zhang T, Dorman MF, Gifford R, Moore BC.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Feb; 35(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 24950254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
    Cooper WB, Tobey E, Loizou PC.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.