These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Development of auditory temporal resolution in school-age children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise. Stuart A. Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 15692306 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Contralateral suppression of transient otoacoustic emissions and sentence recognition in noise in young adults. Stuart A, Butler AK. J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):686-96. PubMed ID: 23072961 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss. Wilson RH, McArdle R, Betancourt MB, Herring K, Lipton T, Chisolm TH. J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet, continuous noise, and interrupted noise in school-age children. Stuart A. J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Feb; 19(2):135-46; quiz 191-2. PubMed ID: 18669127 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Interactive effects of low-pass filtering and masking noise on word recognition. Scott T, Green WB, Stuart A. J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Oct; 12(9):437-44. PubMed ID: 11699814 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence of a speech evoked electrophysiological release from masking in noise. Faucette SP, Stuart A. J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):EL218. PubMed ID: 28863590 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Word recognition in continuous noise, interrupted noise, and in quiet by normal-hearing listeners at two sensation levels. Stuart A, Phillips DP. Scand Audiol; 1997 Aug; 26(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 9187004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm. Wilson RH, McArdle R, Watts KL, Smith SL. J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN). Wilson RH, Trivette CP, Williams DA, Watts KL. J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of auditory temporal resolution between monolingual Persian and bilingual Turkish-Persian individuals. Omidvar S, Jafari Z, Tahaei AA, Salehi M. Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 23398178 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners. Grant KW, Walden TC. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients. Busby PA, Arora K. Ear Hear; 2016 Apr; 37(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 26671316 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The MAndarin spoken word-Picture IDentification test in noise-Adaptive (MAPID-A) measures subtle speech-recognition-in-noise changes and spatial release from masking in very young children. Yuen KCP, Qiu XY, Mou HY, Xi X. PLoS One; 2019 Apr; 14(1):e0209768. PubMed ID: 30629627 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB. J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]