These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

177 related items for PubMed ID: 33020356

  • 1. Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Four Different Materials in the Repair of Amalgam Restorations: An In Vitro Study.
    Chavan A, Darak P, Vallabhaneni S, Peerzade SM, Shenvi S, Patil TN.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jul 01; 21(7):741-747. PubMed ID: 33020356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study.
    Popoff DA, Gonçalves FS, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN, Ferreira RC, Mjör IA.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Jul 01; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative Assessment of Marginal Micro Leakage of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Used on Primary Teeth: An In-vitro Study.
    Al Ghwainem A, Alqarni AS.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Jan 01; 25(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 38514432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of Hand Instrumentation and Ultrasonic Scaling on the Microleakage of various Cervical Restorations: An in vitro Study.
    Rohani B, Barekatain M, Farhad SZ, Haghayegh N.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jun 01; 18(6):437-442. PubMed ID: 28621270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An In vitro study.
    Bansal D, Mahajan M.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017 Jun 01; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different direct restorative materials (silver amalgam, glass ionomer cement, cention N), in Class II restorations using stereomicroscope: An in vitro study.
    Mazumdar P, Das A, Das UK.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019 Jun 01; 30(2):277-281. PubMed ID: 31169163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H, Ghavamnasiri M, Manari V.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov 01; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, García-Godoy F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May 01; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A, Kundabala M, Gupta V, Verma M, Batra C, Shenoy R, Srikant N.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011 May 01; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Chuang SF, Jin YT, Tsai PF, Wong TY.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep 01; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999 Sep 01; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M, Karvandi TM, Kamali B, Mazaheri H.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Sep 01; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K, Boutsiouki C, Gerasimou P.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep 01; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S, Azarsina M, Majidi S.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Sep 01; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations: an in vitro study.
    Hallett KB, Garcia-Godoy F.
    Dent Mater; 1993 Sep 01; 9(5):306-11. PubMed ID: 7995482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N, Ozata F, Sepetcioglu F.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997 Sep 01; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY, Zhu LK, Li MY, Wang J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov 01; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Assessment of Microleakage Using Dye Penetration Method in Primary Teeth Restored with Tooth-colored Materials: An In Vitro Study.
    Punathil S, Almalki SA, AlJameel AH, Gowdar IM, Mc VA, Chinnari K.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul 01; 20(7):778-782. PubMed ID: 31597795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Microleakage Evaluation of an Alkasite Restorative Material: An In Vitro Dye Penetration Study.
    Kini A, Shetty S, Bhat R, Shetty P.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Nov 01; 20(11):1315-1318. PubMed ID: 31892684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Microleakage Properties of Cention-N, Composite, and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials.
    Sujith R, Yadav TG, Pitalia D, Babaji P, Apoorva K, Sharma A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jun 01; 21(6):691-695. PubMed ID: 33025941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.