These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

253 related items for PubMed ID: 33025941

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different direct restorative materials (silver amalgam, glass ionomer cement, cention N), in Class II restorations using stereomicroscope: An in vitro study.
    Mazumdar P, Das A, Das UK.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(2):277-281. PubMed ID: 31169163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessment of Microleakage Using Dye Penetration Method in Primary Teeth Restored with Tooth-colored Materials: An In Vitro Study.
    Punathil S, Almalki SA, AlJameel AH, Gowdar IM, Mc VA, Chinnari K.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul 01; 20(7):778-782. PubMed ID: 31597795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study.
    Meshram P, Meshram V, Palve D, Patil S, Gade V, Raut A.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019 Jul 01; 30(3):403-407. PubMed ID: 31397416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K, Boutsiouki C, Gerasimou P.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep 01; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparing marginal microleakage in Class V cavities restored with flowable composite and Cention-N using confocal microscope-an in-vitro study.
    Shenoi PR, Kokane VB, Thawale HV, Kubde RR, Gunwal MK, Shahu SP.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2021 Sep 01; 32(3):348-353. PubMed ID: 35229775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study.
    Venugopal K, Krishnaprasad L, V P PS, Ravi AB, Haridas K, Soman D.
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun 01; 13(Suppl 1):S132-S136. PubMed ID: 34447061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Fiber-reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement Restorations Immersed in Three Different Beverages: In Vitro Study.
    George MA, Chandak SA, Khekade SH, Gahlod NB, Wasnik MB, V SM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Apr 01; 25(4):346-353. PubMed ID: 38956850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H, Zhang F, Wu Y, Chen C, Liu W.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec 01; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.