These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

326 related items for PubMed ID: 3303319

  • 1. [Comparison of 3 ECG computer programs with interpretation by physicians].
    Saner H, Lindeland A, Scallen R, Paule W, Lange HW, Gobel FL.
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Jul 07; 117(27-28):1035-9. PubMed ID: 3303319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?].
    Morisbak B, Gjesdal K.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep 30; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Computer-assisted ECG evaluation in polyclinic patients].
    Koenig W, Witzleb EJ, Khatibnia U.
    Fortschr Med; 1981 Jun 25; 99(24):934-6. PubMed ID: 7021376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinicians, the Mount Sinai program and the Veterans' Administration program evaluated against clinico-pathological data derived independently of the electrocardiogram.
    Bourdillon PJ, Kilpatrick D.
    Eur J Cardiol; 1978 Nov 25; 8(4-5):395-412. PubMed ID: 152709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Fully automatic computer-analysis of electrocardiograms in clinical routine (author's transl)].
    Mengden HJ, Just H, Kaspar W, Löllgen H, Kersting F.
    Z Kardiol; 1978 Oct 25; 67(10):707-16. PubMed ID: 366940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [The Caceres-USPHS (version HP-3) computer program. Evaluation of automatic analysis of 40,000 ECG (author's transl)].
    Feruglio GA, Feraco E, Maisano G.
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975 Oct 25; 5(2):262-71. PubMed ID: 1102374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Willems JL, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud P, van Bemmel JH, Brohet C, Degani R, Denis B, Gehring J, Graham I, van Herpen G.
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec 19; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Value of the automated analysis of the electrocardiogram by the Telemed program (V version)].
    Bernard P, Chaitman BR, Scholl JM, Chabot M.
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Oct 19; 74(10):1155-62. PubMed ID: 6796019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [The concept of a computer-assisted electrocardiographic diagnostic system].
    Szabo T.
    Sante Publique (Bucur); 1989 Oct 19; 32(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 2675342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Eyewitness to history: Landmarks in the development of computerized electrocardiography.
    Rautaharju PM.
    J Electrocardiol; 2016 Oct 19; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26620728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Errors in the computerized electrocardiogram interpretation of cardiac rhythm.
    Shah AP, Rubin SA.
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Oct 19; 40(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 17531257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The impact of an ECG computer analysis program on the cardiologist's interpretation. A cooperative study.
    Milliken JA, Pipberger H, Pipberger HV, Araoye MA, Ari R, Burggraf GW, Fletcher RD, Katz RJ, Lopez EA, McCans JL, Silver AM.
    J Electrocardiol; 1983 Apr 19; 16(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 6222129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparative diagnostic performance of the Telemed computer ECG program.
    Bernard P, Chaitman BR, Scholl JM, Val PG, Chabot M.
    J Electrocardiol; 1983 Jan 19; 16(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 6220102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Interpretation of short ECGs with a personal computer: the Porto program.
    Abreu-Lima C, de Sá JP.
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep 19; 29(4):410-2. PubMed ID: 2233389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The impact of computers on electrocardiography.
    Rautaharju PM.
    Eur J Cardiol; 1978 Sep 19; 8(2):237-48. PubMed ID: 699951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation.
    Guglin ME, Thatai D.
    Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jan 13; 106(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 16321696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Accuracy of analysis and susceptibility to faults in ECG detection using pacemakers with diagnostic functions].
    Stangl K, Sichart U, Wirtzfeld A, Blömer H.
    Z Kardiol; 1988 May 13; 77(5):318-24. PubMed ID: 3407277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Experiences with different computerprograms for the ECG-analysis.
    Meyer J, Heinrich KW, Merx W, Effert S.
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975 May 13; 5(2):279-87. PubMed ID: 1102376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The reproducibility of interpretation of 10 computer ECG systems by means of a microprocessor-based ECG signal generator.
    Miyahara H, Domae A, Sato T.
    Comput Biomed Res; 1984 Aug 13; 17(4):311-25. PubMed ID: 6383703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [A comparison of various computer programmes for analysing the electrocardiogram].
    Meyer J.
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1972 Apr 07; 97(14):552-9. PubMed ID: 4112250
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.