These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
419 related items for PubMed ID: 33039820
1. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving. Goncalves RC, Louw TL, Quaresma M, Madigan R, Merat N. Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of information from dash-based human-machine interfaces on drivers' gaze patterns and lane-change manoeuvres after conditionally automated driving. Gonçalves RC, Louw TL, Madigan R, Quaresma M, Romano R, Merat N. Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106726. PubMed ID: 35716544 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour. Madigan R, Louw T, Merat N. PLoS One; 2018 Sep; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Keeping the driver in the loop through semi-automated or manual lane changes in conditionally automated driving. Dillmann J, den Hartigh RJR, Kurpiers CM, Pelzer J, Raisch FK, Cox RFA, de Waard D. Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106397. PubMed ID: 34563644 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Design and evaluation of cooperative human-machine interface for changing lanes in conditional driving automation. Muslim H, Kiu Leung C, Itoh M. Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106719. PubMed ID: 35660872 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards unpacking older drivers' visual-motor coordination: A gaze-based integrated driving assessment. Sun QC, Xia JC, He J, Foster J, Falkmer T, Lee H. Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():85-96. PubMed ID: 29407672 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Driver Visual Attention Before and After Take-Over Requests During Automated Driving on Public Roads. Pipkorn L, Dozza M, Tivesten E. Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):336-347. PubMed ID: 35708240 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Driver behaviors assisted by different human machine interfaces to avoid rear-end collisions during level 2 automated driving. Yang B, Saito T, Wang Z, Kitazaki S, Nakano K. Traffic Inj Prev; 2023 Feb; 24(6):475-481. PubMed ID: 37339499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments. Robbins CJ, Allen HA, Chapman P. Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation. Wright TJ, Agrawal R, Samuel S, Wang Y, Zilberstein S, Fisher DL. Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying drivers' visual perception to analyze accident-prone locations on two-lane mountain highways. Yu B, Chen Y, Bao S, Xu D. Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():122-130. PubMed ID: 30025353 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Moving Into the Loop: An Investigation of Drivers' Steering Behavior in Highly Automated Vehicles. Alsaid A, Lee JD, Price M. Hum Factors; 2020 Jun; 62(4):671-683. PubMed ID: 31180728 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Zeeb K, Buchner A, Schrauf M. Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Driver Vigilance Decrement is More Severe During Automated Driving than Manual Driving. Greenlee ET, DeLucia PR, Newton DC. Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):574-588. PubMed ID: 35624552 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]