These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
239 related items for PubMed ID: 33049147
1. Spatial Release From Informational and Energetic Masking in Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users. D'Onofrio K, Richards V, Gifford R. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Nov 13; 63(11):3816-3833. PubMed ID: 33049147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial Release From Masking in Bimodal and Bilateral Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients. King K, Dillon MT, O'Connell BP, Brown KD, Park LR. Am J Audiol; 2021 Mar 10; 30(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 33259722 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Availability of binaural cues for bilateral implant recipients and bimodal listeners with and without preserved hearing in the implanted ear. Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Sheffield SW, Teece K, Olund AP. Audiol Neurootol; 2014 Mar 10; 19(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 24356514 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech Recognition With Informational and Energetic Maskers in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness After Cochlear Implantation. Müller V, Lang-Roth R. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug 09; 64(8):3343-3356. PubMed ID: 34310192 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing. Williges B, Dietz M, Hohmann V, Jürgens T. Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants. Xu K, Willis S, Gopen Q, Fu QJ. Ear Hear; 2020 Dec 30; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential Effects of Binaural Pitch Fusion Range on the Benefits of Voice Gender Differences in a "Cocktail Party" Environment for Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users. Oh Y, Srinivasan NK, Hartling CL, Gallun FJ, Reiss LAJ. Ear Hear; 2020 Dec 30; 44(2):318-329. PubMed ID: 36395512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of better-ear glimpsing, binaural unmasking, and spectral resolution on spatial release from masking in cochlear-implant users. Gibbs BE, Bernstein JGW, Brungart DS, Goupell MJ. J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug 30; 152(2):1230. PubMed ID: 36050186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects with an energetic or informational masker in bilateral and bimodal CI users. Pyschny V, Landwehr M, Hahn M, Lang-Roth R, Walger M, Meister H. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct 30; 57(5):1942-60. PubMed ID: 24825129 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening. Fathima H, Bhat JS, Pitchaimuthu AN. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jul 30; 280(7):3209-3217. PubMed ID: 36695909 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Novel Approaches to Measure Spatial Release From Masking in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants. Peng ZE, Litovsky RY. Ear Hear; 2022 Jul 30; 43(1):101-114. PubMed ID: 34133400 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of a moving noise masker on speech perception in cochlear implant users. Weissgerber T, Rader T, Baumann U. PLoS One; 2015 Jul 30; 10(5):e0126133. PubMed ID: 25970594 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking. Goupell MJ, Stoelb CA, Kan A, Litovsky RY. Ear Hear; 2018 Jul 30; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Binaural summation, binaural unmasking and fluctuating masker benefit in bimodal and bilateral adult cochlear implant users. de Graaff F, Eikelboom RH, Sucher C, Kramer SE, Smits C. Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 Sep 30; 22(5):245-256. PubMed ID: 33832408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors underlying masking release by voice-gender differences and spatial separation cues in multi-talker listening environments in listeners with and without hearing loss. Oh Y, Hartling CL, Srinivasan NK, Diedesch AC, Gallun FJ, Reiss LAJ. Front Neurosci; 2022 Sep 30; 16():1059639. PubMed ID: 36507363 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects. Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C. Hear Res; 2017 Jul 30; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners. Chen J, Shi Y, Kong Y, Chen B, Zhang L, Galvin JJ, Li Y, Fu QJ. Ear Hear; 2017 Jul 30; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech Understanding With Bimodal Stimulation Is Determined by Monaural Signal to Noise Ratios: No Binaural Cue Processing Involved. Dieudonné B, Francart T. Ear Hear; 2020 Jul 30; 41(5):1158-1171. PubMed ID: 32833388 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Binaural advantages in users of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant devices. Kokkinakis K, Pak N. J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan 30; 135(1):EL47-53. PubMed ID: 24437856 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]