These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

370 related items for PubMed ID: 3306773

  • 1. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA.
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [X-ray examination of the breast (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M.
    Rontgenblatter; 1981 Apr; 34(4):151-60. PubMed ID: 7015468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E, Aichinger U, Böhner C, Säbel M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bautz W.
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [The reduction of radiation burden in mammography using film-screen combination systems].
    Waegner U, Geissler S, Rosenkranz G.
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990 Jul; 31(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 2277840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-].
    Honda C, Ohara H, Ishisaka A, Shimada F, Endo T.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Jul; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Complex evaluation of film mammographic imaging systems. 2. Comparison of 18 systems using a signal-noise matrix].
    Friedrich M, Weskamp P.
    Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 6429790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A, Hemdal B, Andersson I, Ruschin M, Thilander-Klang A, Börjesson S, Tingberg A, Mattsson S, Håkansson M, Båth M, Månsson LG, Medin J, Wanninger F, Panzer W.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jun; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
    Hermann KP, Hundertmark C, Funke M, von Brenndorff A, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z, Du X, Liu J, Yao X, Yang Y, Li K.
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M, Hermann KP, Breiter N, Moritz J, Müller D, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
    Feig SA, Yaffe MJ.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Breast radiation dose in film/screen mammography.
    Prado KL, Rakowski JT, Barragan F, Vanek KN.
    Health Phys; 1988 Jul; 55(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 3391781
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
    Verdun FR, Pachoud M, Bergmann D, Buhr E.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jul; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Examinations of rare-earth film-screen-systems for image detectors in mammography (author's transl)].
    Weberling R.
    Rontgenblatter; 1979 Mar; 32(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 432483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG.
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [The use of the Daylight System in mammography].
    Giuseppetti G, Maggi S, Ercolani P, Procaccini G, Amici F.
    Radiol Med; 1989 Oct; 78(1-2):107-11. PubMed ID: 2781054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Experimental study on image quality when using screens in mammography (author's transl)].
    Maurer HJ, Goos F.
    Rofo; 1979 Mar; 130(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 155580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
    Chida K, Zuguchi M, Sai M, Saito H, Yamada T, Ishibashi T, Ito D, Kimoto N, Kohzuki M, Takahashi S.
    Clin Imaging; 2005 Mar; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.