These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

69 related items for PubMed ID: 3307448

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The University of California, San Francisco/Storz cochlear implant program.
    Schindler RA, Kessler DK, Rebscher SJ, Yanda J.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):287-305. PubMed ID: 3520442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. State of the art of cochlear implants. The UCSF experience.
    Schindler RA, Kessler DK.
    Am J Otol; 1989 Mar; 10(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 2660581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The UCSF/Storz multichannel cochlear implant: patient results.
    Schindler RA, Kessler DK, Rebscher SJ, Yanda JL, Jackler RK.
    Laryngoscope; 1986 Jun; 96(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 3754921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J, Baker S, Caraway T, Kasulis H, Mears A, Smith J, Swim L, Wood M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA, Black JM, Koch DB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation.
    Vincenti V, Pasanisi E, Guida M, Di Trapani G, Sanna M.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 Apr; 13(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18259080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Some benefits and limitations of binaural cochlear implants and our ability to measure them.
    Tyler RS, Noble W, Dunn C, Witt S.
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45 Suppl 1():S113-9. PubMed ID: 16938783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A, Brenner C, Davidson L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.