These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
339 related items for PubMed ID: 33143902
1. Influences of build angle on the accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of additively manufactured surgical templates. Rubayo DD, Phasuk K, Vickery JM, Morton D, Lin WS. J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):658-663. PubMed ID: 33143902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography apparatus 3-dimensional printing. Yu BY, Son K, Lee KB. J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 32807402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study. Herschdorfer L, Negreiros WM, Gallucci GO, Hamilton A. J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the fit of surgical guides manufactured with low-cost 3D printers. Bennett GW, Kim SK. Gen Dent; 2022 Jun; 70(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 34978984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of build orientation and layer thickness on manufacturing accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of 3D printed complete denture bases. Song S, Zhang J, Liu M, Li F, Bai S. J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104435. PubMed ID: 36693587 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology. Chen Y, Li H, Zhai Z, Nakano T, Ishigaki S. J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of printing direction on stress distortion of three-dimensional printed dentures using stereolithography technology. Hada T, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Arakida T, Minakuchi S. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103949. PubMed ID: 32957241 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of 3D Printing Orientation on the Accuracy of Implant Surgical Templates Fabricated By Desktop Printer. Tahir N, Abduo J. J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):791-798. PubMed ID: 35067993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The three-dimensional stability and accuracy of 3D printing surgical templates: An In Vitro study. Lan D, Luo Y, Qu Y, Man Y. J Dent; 2024 May; 144():104936. PubMed ID: 38492806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of print orientation and wet-dry storage time on the intaglio accuracy of additively manufactured occlusal devices. Revilla-León M, Cascos-Sánchez R, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Gómez-Polo M. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1226-1234. PubMed ID: 36635137 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used. Yeager B, Çakmak G, Zheng F, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov; 132(5):995-1004. PubMed ID: 36690552 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost and effectiveness of 3-dimensionally printed model using three different printing layer parameters and two resins. Dias Resende CC, Quirino Barbosa TA, Moura GF, Piola Rizzante FA, Mendonça G, Zancopé K, Domingues das Neves F. J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):350-353. PubMed ID: 34218898 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy and degree of polymerization of stereolithography photopolymer resin under different postpolymerization conditions: An in vitro study. Katheng A, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Minakuchi S. J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 32416982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]