These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
329 related items for PubMed ID: 33151780
1. Effect of different preparation designs and all ceramic materials on fracture strength of molar endocrowns. Haralur SB, Alamrey AA, Alshehri SA, Alzahrani DS, Alfarsi M. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800020947329. PubMed ID: 33151780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution. Dartora G, Rocha Pereira GK, Varella de Carvalho R, Zucuni CP, Valandro LF, Cesar PF, Caldas RA, Bacchi A. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis. Skalskyi V, Makeev V, Stankevych O, Pavlychko R. Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of restorative material selection and cementation procedures on the durability of endocrowns in the anterior teeth: an in-vitro study. Samra N, Madina MM, El-Negoly SAE, Dawood L. BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun 08; 24(1):670. PubMed ID: 38851731 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading. Baladhandayutham B, Lawson NC, Burgess JO. J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug 08; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance and failure modes of lithium disilicate or composite endocrowns. Altier M, Erol F, Yildirim G, Dalkilic EE. Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Jul 08; 21(7):821-826. PubMed ID: 29984710 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Effect of occlusal thickness design on the fracture resistance of endocrowns restored with lithium disilicate ceramic and zirconia]. Lin ZX, Pan ZX, Ye QQ, Zheng ZQ, Lin J. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Dec 01; 38(6):647-651. PubMed ID: 33377341 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultra-thin occlusal veneers bonded to enamel and made of ceramic or hybrid materials exhibit load-bearing capacities not different from conventional restorations. Ioannidis A, Mühlemann S, Özcan M, Hüsler J, Hämmerle CHF, Benic GI. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb 01; 90():433-440. PubMed ID: 30447557 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of feldspathic and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network CAD/CAM endocrowns for maxillary premolars. Saglam G, Cengiz S, Karacaer O. Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Jan 01; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 31929199 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations. Hamza TA, Sherif RM. J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan 01; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of preparation design on fracture resistance of molars restored with occlusal veneers of different CAD-CAM materials: an in vitro study. Taha AI, Hafez ME. BMC Oral Health; 2024 Oct 01; 24(1):1168. PubMed ID: 39354422 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations utilizing different machinable blocks subjected to thermomechanical aging. Taha D, Spintzyk S, Sabet A, Wahsh M, Salah T. J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jul 01; 30(4):319-328. PubMed ID: 30113129 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials. Pedrollo Lise D, Van Ende A, De Munck J, Umeda Suzuki TY, Cardoso Vieira LC, Van Meerbeek B. J Dent; 2017 Apr 01; 59():54-61. PubMed ID: 28214537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance and failure modes of polymer infiltrated ceramic endocrown restorations with variations in margin design and occlusal thickness. Taha D, Spintzyk S, Schille C, Sabet A, Wahsh M, Salah T, Geis-Gerstorfer J. J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul 01; 62(3):293-297. PubMed ID: 29241944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture Strength of Endocrowns Fabricated From Three Different Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Ceramic Materials: An In-Vitro Study. Alshali S, Attar E. Cureus; 2023 Jul 01; 15(7):e41531. PubMed ID: 37426406 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture strengths of endocrown restorations fabricated with different preparation depths and CAD/CAM materials. Kanat-Ertürk B, Saridağ S, Köseler E, Helvacioğlu-Yiğit D, Avcu E, Yildiran-Avcu Y. Dent Mater J; 2018 Mar 30; 37(2):256-265. PubMed ID: 29311428 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical behavior of all-ceramic endocrowns fabricated using CAD/CAM: A systematic review. AlHelal AA. J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Jan 16; 68(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 37286503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of fracture resistance and fracture characterization of bilayered zirconia/fluorapatite and monolithic lithium disilicate all ceramic crowns. Altamimi AM, Tripodakis AP, Eliades G, Hirayama H. Int J Esthet Dent; 2014 Jan 16; 9(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 24757702 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture strength of endocrown maxillary restorations using different preparation designs and materials. Al Fodeh RS, Al-Johi OS, Alibrahim AN, Al-Dwairi ZN, Al-Haj Husain N, Özcan M. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Dec 16; 148():106184. PubMed ID: 37839334 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the mechanical properties of translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate. Kwon SJ, Lawson NC, McLaren EE, Nejat AH, Burgess JO. J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul 16; 120(1):132-137. PubMed ID: 29310875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]