These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

348 related items for PubMed ID: 33168369

  • 1. Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial.
    Leung YY, Wang R, Wong NSM, Li DTS, Au SW, Choi WS, Su YX.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 50(7):933-939. PubMed ID: 33168369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial.
    Li DTS, Wang R, Wong NSM, Leung YY.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 34627665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of the quality of life changes of patients receiving sagittal split ramus osteotomy or intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Wong NSM, Leung YY.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Apr; 27(4):1435-1448. PubMed ID: 36881158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparisons of Jaw Line and Face Line after Mandibular Setback: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies.
    Chen CM, Tseng YC, Ko EC, Chen MY, Chen KJ, Cheng JH.
    Biomed Res Int; 2018 Apr; 2018():1375085. PubMed ID: 30662900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement.
    Komori H, Kawanabe N, Kataoka T, Kato Y, Fujisawa A, Yamashiro T, Kamioka H.
    Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 28436308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Retrospective study of changes in the sensitivity of the oral mucosa: sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO).
    Hasegawa T, Tateishi C, Asai M, Imai Y, Okamoto N, Shioyasono A, Kimoto A, Akashi M, Suzuki H, Furudoi S, Komori T.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 44(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 25468631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of osseous healing after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Rokutanda S, Yamada S, Yanamoto S, Omori K, Fujimura Y, Morita Y, Rokutanda H, Kohara H, Fujishita A, Nakamura T, Yoshimi T, Yoshida N, Umeda M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1316-1321. PubMed ID: 29843949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Does mandibular osteotomy affect gonial angle in patients with class III deformity? Vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split osteotomy.
    Tabrizi R, Pakshir H, Behnia H, Akhlaghi S, Shahsavari N.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Aug; 45(8):992-6. PubMed ID: 27012604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Vertical ramus versus sagittal split osteotomies: comparison of stability after mandibular setback.
    Yoshioka I, Khanal A, Tominaga K, Horie A, Furuta N, Fukuda J.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1138-44. PubMed ID: 18486778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Transitional joint effusion in the mandibular prognathic surgery patient: intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Nishimura M, Segami N, Sato J, Honjou M, Fujimura K.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 May; 62(5):545-8. PubMed ID: 15122556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Skeletal Stability after Mandibular Setback via Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Verse Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.
    Chen CM, Hwang DS, Hsiao SY, Chen HS, Hsu KJ.
    J Clin Med; 2021 Oct 26; 10(21):. PubMed ID: 34768470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY, Hong J, Kim CS, Kim MJ.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec 26; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Postoperative stability of bimaxillary surgery in Class III patients with mandibular protrusion and mandibular deviation: a frontal cephalometric study.
    Al-Gunaid T, Yamada K, Takagi R, Saito C, Saito I.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov 26; 37(11):992-8. PubMed ID: 18621507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy used to correct Class III malocclusion: review of the literature.
    Costa F, Robiony M, Politi M.
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001 Nov 26; 16(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11482290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A new osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: techniques and rationale of the intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy.
    Choung PH.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1992 Nov 26; 20(4):153-62. PubMed ID: 1629365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.