These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy: A 10-year national follow-up study. Kuittinen T, Tulokas S, Rahkola-Soisalo P, Brummer T, Jalkanen J, Tomas E, Mäkinen J, Sjöberg J, Härkki P, Mentula M. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 May 21; 102(5):556-566. PubMed ID: 37014706 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function. De La Cruz JF, Myers EM, Geller EJ. J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014 May 21; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Izett-Kay ML, Rahmanou P, Cartwright RJ, Price N, Jackson SR. Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul 21; 33(7):1957-1965. PubMed ID: 34424347 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The modified Manchester Fothergill procedure compared with vaginal hysterectomy with low uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: long-term outcome. Enklaar RA, Knapen FMFM, Schulten SFM, van Osch LADM, van Leijsen SAL, Gondrie ETCM, Weemhoff M. Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan 21; 34(1):155-164. PubMed ID: 35652948 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation, laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy and abdominal hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy in terms of postoperative quality of life and sexual function. Okcu NT, Gürbüz T, Uysal G. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr 21; 50(4):101977. PubMed ID: 33166707 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of laparoscopic hysteropectopexy and vaginal hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Lee JN, Yim MH, Na YJ, Song YJ, Kim HG. Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jun 21; 76(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 36786782 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of patient reported outcomes, pelvic floor function and recurrence after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with McCall suspension for advanced uterine prolapse. Şükür YE, Dökmeci F, Çetinkaya ŞE, Seval MM. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr 21; 247():127-131. PubMed ID: 32092668 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The effectiveness of McCall culdoplasty following vaginal hysterectomy in advanced stages of uterine prolapse. Barber E, Kleiner I, Tairy D, Bar J, Ginath S. Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug 21; 32(8):2143-2148. PubMed ID: 34181067 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy with concomitant pelvic reconstructive surgery. Luchristt D, Kenton K, Bretschneider CE. Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov 21; 33(11):3005-3011. PubMed ID: 35020034 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abdominal and vaginal pelvic support with concomitant hysterectomy for uterovaginal pelvic prolapse: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. Alfahmy A, Mahran A, Conroy B, Brewka RR, Ibrahim M, Sheyn D, El-Nashar SA, Hijaz A. Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug 21; 32(8):2021-2031. PubMed ID: 34050771 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse]. Liang XZ, Xu LZ, Chen LQ, Wang S, Lin XT, Zhang XW. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar 25; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]