These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
387 related items for PubMed ID: 33176924
1. Effect of cementation and aging on the marginal fit of veneered and monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns. Del Piñal M, Lopez-Suarez C, Bartolome JF, Volpato CA, Suarez MJ. J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):323.e1-323.e7. PubMed ID: 33176924 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns. Kale E, Seker E, Yilmaz B, Özcelik TB. J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis. Martinez-Rus F, Ferreiroa A, Ozcan M, Pradies G. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Dec; 28(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 23527350 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns. Kale E, Yilmaz B, Seker E, Özcelik TB. J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal Vertical Discrepancies of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia and Metal-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses. Lopez-Suarez C, Gonzalo E, Pelaez J, Serrano B, Suarez MJ. Int J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 29(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 27148985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Monolithic Ceramic and Metal-Ceramic Crowns. Freire Y, Gonzalo E, Lopez-Suarez C, Suarez MJ. J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 28152246 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns. Martínez-Rus F, Suárez MJ, Rivera B, Pradíes G. Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems. Hamza TA, Sherif RM. J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by additive or subtractive manufacturing methods. Yildirim B. J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):476.e1-476.e6. PubMed ID: 32451142 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. Gonzalo E, Suárez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF. J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of two preparation designs on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of two types of ceramic crowns using CAD/CAM technology (In vitro study). Ashour AM, El-Kateb MM, Azer AS. BMC Oral Health; 2024 Sep 11; 24(1):1065. PubMed ID: 39261857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonça G. J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct 11; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading. Baladhandayutham B, Lawson NC, Burgess JO. J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug 11; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the marginal fit of monolithic crowns fabricated by direct and indirect digitization. Freire Y, Gonzalo E, Lopez-Suarez C, Pelaez J, Suarez MJ. J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug 21; 65(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 33041277 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans. Kale E, Cilli M, Özçelik TB, Yilmaz B. J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May 21; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramic and veneered zirconia molar crowns after aging in a mastication simulator. Bankoğlu Güngör M, Karakoca Nemli S. J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar 21; 119(3):473-480. PubMed ID: 28645670 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Influence of coping material selection and porcelain firing on marginal and internal fit of computer-aided design/computer- aided manufacturing of zirconia and titanium ceramic implant-supported crowns]. Cuiling L, Liyuan Y, Xu G, Hong S. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jun 21; 34(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 27526450 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal fit of monolithic versus layered zirconia crowns assessed with 2 marginal gap methods. Fasih P, Tavakolizadeh S, Sedaghat Monfared M, Sofi-Mahmudi A, Yari A. J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug 21; 130(2):250.e1-250.e7. PubMed ID: 37451899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses. Att W, Komine F, Gerds T, Strub JR. J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr 21; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal and Internal Discrepancies of Posterior Zirconia-Based Crowns Fabricated with Three Different CAD/CAM Systems Versus Metal-Ceramic. Ortega R, Gonzalo E, Gomez-Polo M, Suárez MJ. Int J Prosthodont; 2015 Apr 21; 28(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 26340011 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]