These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

219 related items for PubMed ID: 33191039

  • 21. Single-use versus reusable medical devices in spinal fusion surgery: a hospital micro-costing analysis.
    Bouthors C, Nguyen J, Durand L, Dubory A, Raspaud S, Court C.
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 Dec; 29(8):1631-1637. PubMed ID: 31350650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Estimating the true costs of disposable and reusable instruments.
    Mancuso R, Bickham MJ.
    AORN J; 1995 Jul; 62(1):39-42, 45, 47-8. PubMed ID: 7574563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A cost analysis of reusable and disposable flexible optical scopes for intubation.
    Tvede MF, Kristensen MS, Nyhus-Andreasen M.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 May; 56(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 22338623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes.
    Yimyam S, Srisuphan W, Plianpadung S, Senaratana W.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis.
    Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Haller U.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 173(6):1812-5. PubMed ID: 8610767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open orchiopexy in the management of unilateral nonpalpable testicles.
    Lorenzo AJ, Samuelson ML, Docimo SG, Baker LA, Lotan Y.
    J Urol; 2004 Aug; 172(2):712-6. PubMed ID: 15247768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Reprocessing of reusable medical devices.
    Malchesky PS, Chamberlain VC, Scott-Conner C, Salis B, Wallace C.
    ASAIO J; 1995 Aug; 41(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 7640417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Cost comparison of reusable and single-use ultrasonic shears for laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
    Yung E, Gagner M, Pomp A, Dakin G, Milone L, Strain G.
    Obes Surg; 2010 Apr; 20(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 19015932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.